Advertise Here

Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.

Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.

Learn more about ads.

About Us

Frank D. Russo

The California Progress Report is published by Frank D. Russo, a longtime observer of and participant in California politics.

About Frank Russo.
About California Progress Report.

Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column? Contact Frank here.

Sponsors

Californians Can Learn from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on Health Care

Anthony-Wright.gif By Anthony Wright
Executive Director of Health Access California

So I have a love/hate relationship with Massachusetts.

I am a Bronxite who roots for the Yankees, and I'm beside myself that the Red Sox won the World Series. But I have fond memories going to college at Amherst, and loved the formal close of our Commencement, with the banging of a large staff and the pronouncement: "God save the Commonwealth of Massachusetts."

On health policy, I was happy that Massachusetts helped focus attention on state reforms for expanding coverage, although I remind folks that California was one percentage point away a few years earlier, in 2003, with SB2 and Prop 72.

On the actual reform plan, it's not our place to support or oppose the Massachusetts plan, but we have produced both discussion papers and fact sheets that discuss the various provisions, and to make clear the major differences between our two states.

Even so, there is a lot to learn from the discussion going on in Massachusetts. Our colleagues from Health Care for All Massachusetts (not affiliated with our board member Health Care for All California) have been liveblogging the deliberations of their "Connector" board, which makes for interesting, although wonky, reading. As expected, there are things that are working, and things that aren't.

It's odd that Governor Schwarnzenegger's health proposal seems oblivious to these discussions, especially with regard to the individual mandate (whatever you think of the concept). No condition or exemption based on affordability and availability? No simplification/standardization of the individual market that we are requiring people to go into? Exempting employer-based coverage from what constitutes "minimum coverage" for the mandate?

The Governor's proposal would benefit from a closer look at the consumer protections in the Massachusetts market (Health Access prepared a chart), and learning from their deliberations of what is working and what isn't...

Health Access California is a statewide health care consumer advocacy coalition of over 200 groups. This article has also been published on the Health Access Weblog.

Posted on October 29, 2007

Comments

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

Get email updates!

Get Email Updates

Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.



© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.

RSS

Stat tracker