Advertise Here
Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.
Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.
Our latest headlines
- Weekly Radio Address: Assembly Lead Water Negotiators Huffman, Caballero Discuss this Week’s Historic Agreement to Solve California’s Water Crisis
- Feinstein Once Again Flirts With Entering the Governor’s Race
- A Good Health Care Bill Emerging from the House
- Schwarzenegger Applauds Passage of Peripheral Canal/Dams Water Package
- "Historic" Water Deal Draws Both Praise and Criticism
- Republican State Senators Vote for Administrative Chaos, Backdoor Cuts in IHSS
- Assembly Budget Committee Follow-up Informational Hearing on Implementation on IHSS Program Changes
About Us
David Greenwald, Editor. (Contact David.)
CFC Education Foundation, Publisher. (Contact us.)
Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column?
Contact David here.
About California Progress Report.
Founded by Frank D. Russo (Publisher and Editor, 2006-08).
Sponsors
Books
Water Legislation Beginning to Boil in California Special Session
First Hearing on Water Special Session Bills Next Week in Senate
Assembly Democrats Announce Water Bills
By Frank D. Russo
The California State Senate will begin hearings next Thursday, October 4 at 9:30 a.m. on the water special session when the Natural Resources & Water Committee meets. The panel will consider competing water supply reliability bonds and bills proposing expenditures of previously authorized water bond funds.
Assembly Bills Introduced
Assemblymember John Laird, who is the lead Assembly Democrat on the water special session, introduced a package of three bills Wednesday that Assembly Democrats are advancing during the special legislative session on water. According to Laird, these bills establish principles for what a final proposal should reflect and address issues including: the immediate crisis in the Delta; a comprehensive strategy that speaks to the state’s water challenges in a timely and cost-effective manner; a safe, clean and reliable water supply for all Californians, particularly disadvantaged communities; and ensuring fiscal responsibility and accountability.
Laird, the leader of the Assembly working group on water said: “These principles will be the lens that any water policy will be filtered through in the Assembly. In articulating these principles, the Assembly is seeking to ensure that anyone who shares in a solution also shares in the sacrifices necessary to bring that solution about. In technical terms, everyone has to give something to get something.”
The Assembly bills, all authored by Laird, are:
• AB 2X 1 Bond Intent
• AB 2X 2 Water Supply Reliability
• AB 2X 3 Delta Sustainability
The Assembly Democratic package is described as complementing proposals pending in the State Senate by Senate President pro Tem Don Perata. By most accounts the senate is expected to take the lead on water as the Assembly may be the lead dancer on health care.
The Assembly Republican caucus also announced the introduction of:
• ABX2 4 (Villines) Water resources: bond funds.
• ABX2 5 (DeVore) Water: electricity for desalination: nuclear energy.
“We’re pulling together many various pieces of a difficult puzzle to develop a responsible and achievable plan that will provide a safe, sufficient and sustainable water supply for every Californian,” Laird said. “Senate President pro Tem Don Perata and his team have been moving quickly to get water legislation into shape. We will work closely with them and I am confident the same cooperative spirit that brought us last year’s historic infrastructure bonds will flourish again this year.”
While the Secretary of State has announced an extended date for placing a bond on the February ballot, Laird cautioned that the complexity of the issue and the potential size of a bond to go before voters will require a significant amount of time for review, stating: “From improving drinking water quality, to improving regional water supply reliability, to protecting the state’s vital Sacramento - San Joaquin Delta, there are a lot of complex issues on the table – but as the Assembly works out the puzzle, all the pieces will be examined carefully to make sure there’s clean, reliable water at the tap.”
Senate Hearing and Lineup of Senate Bills
We do not know who will be testifying at next week's Senate hearings. My well paced Senate source said "everything is still fluid" (pun intended or not). From the description in the Senate file at present, with no specific bills listed, it appears that this may be an informational hearing, and one to begin evaluating the different bills' approaches rather than taking a vote to pass specific bills out of the committee.
The Senate bills introduced in the special session are:
SBX2 1 (Perata) Appropriates $611 million from bonds already passed by the voters in Propositions 1E and 84 on last November's ballot for water quality, flood control, water storage, and wildlife preservation. in bond funds already approved by the voters It is identical to SB 1002 (Perata) that passed during the regular session and is on the Governor's desk.
SBX2 2 (Perata), "The Water Supply Reliability Bond Act of 2008," is a $5.4 billion bond to be placed before the voters. $2 billion of this bond would go for "water supply reliability projects." Another %1.4 billion would go to Delta restoration and operation. A final $1 billion would go to regional projects to resolve conflicts with water supply and water quality. For more on the details of this bill, see our optimistic article that we might already have a water deal by now that we published before the Governor and Republican plan was announced.
SBX2 3 (Cogdill) is a competing bond measure for the ballot, also denominated in the bill as "The Water Supply Reliability Bond Act of 2008." It is a $9 billion bond with $5.6 billion in above and below ground water storage ($5.1 billion in surface storage and $500 million in groundwater storage) and specifically identifies three locations for surface storage (Sites, Temperance Flat Reservoir and Los Vaqueros Expansion Project.). It contains $1.9 billion for "Delta restoration and water supply reliability, and $500 million in grants for specified watersheds throughout the state.
SBX2 4 (Cogdill) Appropriates $552 million from on bonds already passed by the voters for water resources. This is a competing measure to SBX2 1 by Perata.
It appears that Senate Democrats are largely in agreement with the bills introduced by Senator Perata. All measures introduced can be passed by a majority vote.
For more information on the special session on water, please see a listing of articles previously published on water.
Comments
Water can be less costly
Southern Californians use an average 110 gallons of water a day per person. Singapore just built a $120 million water desalination plant that puts out about 34 million gallons a day. Using the 110/gallons per day per person, that $200Million breaks down to only $667 per- person served to build the plant. This means we could build a plant to provide daily water to 10 million people ( almost half of southern California,) for only $6.67 billion!
Now let’s take this one step further. If Southern Californians no longer need Northern California’s water, then Northern California Farmers could farm all they want , instead of rationing. According to the farm Bureau, “Preliminary figures on damage and losses from drought and water shortages run as high as $1.4 billion, in just five San Joaquin Valley counties.” The economical loss for the entire valley could easily be double that.
In effect, the return on investment in building a large salt water desalination plant in southern California would be somewhere around 40%! $6.67 billion to build versus $2.8 billion in increased jobs and food production Ask any investor, this kind of return on investment is extremely good. The plant would pay for itself in less than 3 years! Plus, the additional crops are good for our air quality, as well as our environment.
How would it be funded? Monthly payments to finance a $6.67 billion 20 year loan @7% interest would be about $50 million. There are 25 million people in Southern California. Average household size is 3.5, so approximately 7 million households – paying water utility bills. Therefore, a $7.50 increase in monthly water utility bills would cover the cost to build the plant .
In summary, the economical and environmental benefits far outweigh the costs of building more salt water desalination plants; and funding the costs through increased water utility bills is a viable and fair way of distributing the costs.
Whoever reads this and is in a position to “make a difference”, please check these numbers and facts, and push for more and bigger desalination plants – or maybe even one real big one where the economies of scale would make the costs go way down!
Posted by: Bruce at September 17, 2009 07:43 AM
Sorry, comments are temporarily disabled. We're doing a bit of server maintenance on the commenting area. We'll be back up and running shortly. Thank you for your patience.
Get Email Updates
Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.
© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.
RSS 