Advertise Here

Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.

Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.

Learn more about ads.

About Us

Frank D. Russo

The California Progress Report is published by Frank D. Russo, a longtime observer of and participant in California politics.

About Frank Russo.
About California Progress Report.

Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column? Contact Frank here.

Sponsors

Books

So Now We Are in Special Session on California Health Care. What's the Next Step?

Anthony-Wright.gif By Anthony Wright
Executive Director of Health Access California

When the special session was announced, both the Speaker and the Senate President made the case that the Governor needed to produce language to negotiate about.

As an advocate, it's been frustrating that the Governor's proposal has not evolved, in detail or in policy, from the 10-page concept paper introduced in January. Health Access' preliminary analysis still applies, ten months later. The lack of movement also stops the conversation: a policy change in one area has implications in other areas that then need to be explored in a new light.

It's also part of negotiations. For years, the Legislature has passed (and Health Access and other consumer groups have supported) reform measures, including an employer mandate, children's coverage, and single-payer, but the Governor said "no." In January, the Governor put forward his proposal, of what he would say "yes" to. It borrowed a lot from the previous proposals, but he combined them together with his own details.

So it was the Legislature's turn. The legislature advanced a single-payer proposal again, not giving up on that framework and keeping the momentum for that alive... but if that was the only thing that they placed on his desk, the Governor would say, with reason that the legislative leaders were not working in good faith, since he already rejected that proposal.

The legislative leaders also advanced and placed on his desk a comprehensive bill, AB 8, that was similar to the Governor's proposal, but made changes that fixed objectionable parts and made improvements, especially on affordability and cost containment. In fact, the major differences between AB8 and the Governor's plan were due not to ideology, but to the practicality of needing to pass a financed bill on a majority-vote basis. (The need for a 2/3 vote to raise revenues--and the resulting need to get recalcitrant Republicans--remains a roadblock for both single-payer and the Governor's plan.)

The Governor says he'll veto AB 8. So now it's his turn. The Governor needs to show his language of what he wants, that he thinks will pass. Then we'll see if he and his team listened to the concerns about affordability, about the need for the consumer protections that come with expanding group coverage, rather than relying on the individual market.

The rumor mill has that the Governor will introduce legislative language soon, for the special session. It'll be good to see the details, and if there's been any movement. Then we can have a real--special--discussion.

Health Access California is a statewide health care consumer advocacy coalition of over 200 groups.

Posted on September 20, 2007

Comments

i really want to see this "Health Care".

Posted by: Casinos Online at September 28, 2007 09:13 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

Get email updates!

Get Email Updates

Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.



© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.

RSS

Stat tracker