Advertise Here

Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.

Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.

Learn more about ads.

About Us

Frank D. Russo

The California Progress Report is published by Frank D. Russo, a longtime observer of and participant in California politics.

About Frank Russo.
About California Progress Report.

Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column? Contact Frank here.

Sponsors

Charlie Brown Launches Second Sortie Against Doolittle for California Congressional Seat

Gangale_3.jpg By Thomas Gangale

He had a quiet, matter-of-fact, Iowa way of speaking, but from the first, I saw something in Charlie Brown. I saw an Air Force Academy graduate, an effective leader, an honorable man. I saw the future congressman.

I figured that as he got more experience on the campaign trail, the stiff awkwardness would fall away, and now that the braces were off his teeth, he would learn to smile all over again. But the stiffness and the self-conscious, Washingtonian "I'm afraid to smile" manner made it all the more plain that Charlie was quietly determined.

A newcomer both to the Democratic Party and to politics itself, he was taking on John Doolittle, the seven-term Republican incumbent who had turned California's 4th congressional district into a fiefdom controlled by his political machine. It was one of the largest and most rural of California's districts, stretched along the northern range of the Sierra Nevada, from Lake Tahoe to the Oregon border, encompassing some counties that didn't even have Democratic central committees. The 4th district was the reddest of the red.

It seemed a quixotic quest. Here was an unknown, willing to give up his secure job with the Roseville Police Department to campaign full-time against one of the mighty of the Republican establishment, a close ally of Tom Delay, an ear into which Jack Abramoff whispered. No Democratic congressional candidate had polled higher than the low thirties against Doolittle as he sailed through one reelection after another.

The political pros among California Democrats dismissed Charlie as an impossible dream. "He better raise a million dollars if he wants to be competitive," a top California Democratic Party operative said in October 2005. "That district is not in play," a sitting member of Congress said in January 2006. They looked at the California political map as a static chessboard across which it was impossible to move pieces, a gridlock of safe districts for one party or the other. When top Democrats look at that map, the coast is solidly blue, the east is red, and so it shall ever remain. They know the map, but they didn’t know Charlie.

Charlie, with his understated demeanor, kept campaigning. He won the June 2006 Democratic primary by a comfortable margin. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee's website listed the 4th district race as uncompetitive, and continued to do so as the Abramoff scandal broke, Delay posed for his police mug shot, and Charlie's poll numbers climbed into the forties. When he arrived at a television studio to debate Doolittle, local TV news coverage described the crowd outside as giving Charlie "a rock star's welcome." Charlie, the quiet rock star.

In September 2006, when polls showed the race to be a statistical dead heat, the DCCC put the district on its "watch list," and eventually it pumped some money into Charlie's campaign. Up to that point, Charlie and his wife Jan had done it on their own, and they had rattled the Republicans so badly that President George W. Bush flew in to make several campaign appearances to keep Doolittle afloat. A sitting president--“the war president”--brought in to battle political unknowns.

On Election Day, Doolittle eked out a 9,000-vote victory. I don't know if the Democratic pros sat around the next morning playing woulda coulda shoulda. A decent amount of party support early on might have swung those few thousand votes. But, win or lose, Charlie drew heavy fire from Republican forces from outside the 4th district, which might otherwise have been deployed elsewhere to defeat other Democrats.

It wasn't much of a win for Doolittle, it was more like snatching a slow and agonizing political death from the jaws of a quick and merciful one. Even though he got to keep his house in the Washington suburbs for two more years, he had to suffer the FBI as unwanted but warranted visitors as the Abramoff scandal continued to unravel. And whereas Doolittle easily defeated his primary challenger in 2006, he faces at least two challengers in 2008, with a third weighing his options. There's blood in the water, and the sharks are circling.

Meanwhile, Charlie Brown is stronger than ever. He has two years of campaigning experience, where before he had none. He has a campaign organization, whereas he and Jan started from scratch to nearly unseat Doolittle. And this time, they're not alone. This time they have early support from the DCCC and Democracy for America.

Charlie smiles now, and with good reason. He heavily damaged the target on his first mission, one that others said was hopeless. A second sortie will finish off the target. On 7 September, at Auburn Airport, I saw Charlie and Jan take off on their new mission. As they flew northward to campaign stops in Grass Valley and Quincy, they looked out over the Sierras, and also over the political landscape that they had changed.

Thomas Gangale is an aerospace engineer and a former Air Force officer. He is currently the executive director at OPS-Alaska, a think tank based in Petaluma, where he manages projects in political science and international relations. He is the author of From the Primaries to the Polls: How to Repair America's Broken Presidential Nomination Process, available for pre-order at Amazon.

Posted on September 08, 2007

Comments

I was part of the large group at Auburn airport on Friday to welcome Charlie Brown and his family. I think he is a wonderful candidate. He and Jan give me hope. There hasn't been much of that the past six years. I particularly liked his announcement that he plans to give 5% of all the money he raises for his campaign to veteran groups.....then he challenged all other candidates to do the same. Lt. Colonel Charles Brown is a class act and will be a great leader in Congress. We all need to get behind him for the sake of our families, our country and our veterans.

Posted by: elinor at September 8, 2007 12:34 PM

Keep up the good fight, Charlie Brown!

Here's a portion of Rep. Doolittle's profile at the nonpartisan Americans for Better Legal Immigration website:

Reduce Unnecessary Foreign Workers Visas
Career: D Recent: F-

http://grades.betterimmigration.com/compare.php3?District=CA&Category=5&Status=Career&VIPID=57

There is a broadly - written federal statute that bars "things of value" in exchange for "official acts." 18 USC 201 (Bribery of public officials and witnesses.)

Microsoft Corporation expended over $20 million in so-called "lobbying expenditures" just between 1998 and 2000. Microsoft spent millions more on so-called "campaign finance contributions" during the period.

What was their leading legislative priority during this period? According to an article from the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics, it was to boost the cap for the controversial H-1B visa program. Microsoft in fact helped to procure three beneficial (to Microsoft) changes to the H-1B visa program in 1996, 1998, and 2000.

Now, what was the name of that lawyer that Microsoft hired - via Bill Gates, III father - in 1995? Jack Abramoff, who worked his team and with House leaders such as Rep. Tom DeLay (R-TX.) In fact, once the Abramoff Scandal broke, Microsoft hired the Democratic lobbying firm Glover Park Group to help distance the firm from Jack Abramoff!

So, Microsoft provides "things of value" to the tune of less than $100 million. The "official acts" summarized above have been worth billions annually to Microsoft as the firm displaced experienced American citizen technical professionals for "fresh young (inexpensive) blood, mostly from China and India. Who has been hurt? Millions of American families, whose breadwinners are now employed in lower-paying jobs that make scant use of their training or experience.

This author will email you a gratis just-completed seven page investigative journalism article on this topic titled, "The Abramoff Visa." Just send him an email at c0003180@airmail.net BTW, the author has testified twice against this corrupt visa program in the U.S. House of Representatives.

Posted by: Dr. Gene Nelson at September 8, 2007 07:55 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

Get email updates!

Get Email Updates

Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.



© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.

RSS

Stat tracker