- HOME
- About
- Topics
- Angelides
- Arnold Schwarzenegger
- California Attorney General Race
- California Congressional Races
- California Democratic Party
- California Legislative Races
- California Lt. Governor Race
- California Presidential Primary
- California Secretary of State Race
- California State Budget
- California State Controller
- Campaign Finance Reform
- Campaigns
- Cell Phones
- Children and Families
- Consumer Rights
- Corporate Accountability
- Criminal Justice
- Death With Dignity
- Disaster Preparation
- Discrimination and Civil Rights
- Education
- Elections and Voting
- Electoral College
- Energy
- Environment
- Flood Control
- Food Safety
- Gas Prices
- Governor's Election Race
- Gun control
- Health Care
- Health Insurance
- High Speed Rail
- Hiram Johnson's Corner
- Housing
- Human Rights
- Humor
- Immigration
- Infrastructure
- Initiative Reform
- Insurance Commissioner Race
- Labor
- Language and Politics
- Legal System
- Media and Communication
- Minimum Wage
- Open Government
- Pharmaceutical Companies
- Politics
- Preschool
- Prison Reform
- Privacy
- Privitization
- Prop 85 Parental Notification
- Prop 86 Tobacco Tax
- Prop 87--Alternative Energy
- Prop 90
- Prop 91--Transportation Funding
- Prop 92- Community Colleges
- Prop 93--Term Limits
- Props 94-97--Tribal Gaming
- Props 98 and 99
- Racial Disparities
- Redistricting/Reapportionment
- Responsible Lending
- Retirement Benefits for Public Employees
- Site of the Day
- Structure of California Government
- Taxes
- Toxic Chemicals
- Transportation/Transit
- Water
- Westly
- Workers' Compensation
- Stories
- REMEMBERING MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR.-- April 4th Marks 40 Years Since His Assassination
- The Need for Redistricting Reform from This California Democrat’s Perspective
- The Grim Statistics of Californians Dying for Lack of Health Care Coverage
- Slash and Burn: Proposed Federal Budget Would Cut Environmental Programs Under Fire by Schwarzenegger Administration
- California College Students Plan Day of Action on Budget Cuts
- Spring Break, CALPIRG Style
- “Understanding California's School Funding Crisis: Why it's happening, what it means, and how it can be resolved” is our site of the day
- Hard Hitting Ads Against Denham in California Senate Recall Election Begin Running and Ask: “Don’t We Deserve Better?”
- G.O.P. Assembly Leader Proposes To Save California Public Education Cuts Without New Taxes--By Shifting School Money From Democratic To Republican School Districts
- Oceans Day 2008: Meeting with California Legislators on Issues So Important to Our Coastal State
- Dan Walters Needs Our Help on High Speed Rail in California
- California Sues Bush EPA to Comply With Year Old Supreme Court Ruling on Regulating Greenhouse Gases
- Directory
- Donate
- Contact Us
RSS Advertise Here
Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.
Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.
Our latest headlines
- Education, the California Budget, and Selling Us a Bridge to Nowhere
- Tonight We Celebrate the California Supreme Court Decision for Marriage Equality--Tomorrow We Fight
- California Declares Marriage Equality for All-- A Watershed for Basic Fairness and Human Dignity
- Governor Schwarzenegger Opposes Any Move to Overturn California Supreme Court Decision on Sam Sex Marriage—Ruling Celebrated by Many
- Historic California Supreme Court Ruling Upholds Constitutional Right to Gay Marriage and Strikes Down Statutes and Initiative
- Governor's California May Budget Revision Makes Deeper Health Cuts
- Latest Schwarzenegger Budget Plan Slashes In-Home Supportive Services Which Helps 408,000 Elderly, Blind or Disabled Californians Live Safely At Home
About Us
The California Progress Report is published by Frank D. Russo, a longtime observer of and participant in California politics.
About Frank Russo.
About California Progress Report.
Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column? Contact Frank here.
Sponsors
Broken Process Yields a Bad Budget for California
By John Laird
Chair of
Assembly Budget Committee and
Conference Committee on the Budget
The final state budget has been signed by the governor, and it’s bad news for anyone who looks to the state for health care, lower fees for higher education, human services, public transit, library programs, or protecting parks and the environment.
The budget delay also demonstrated why the budget process is broken. California is one of just three states—the others being Arkansas and Rhode Island—that require a two-thirds vote of each legislative house to approve a budget.
Even though the legislative budget process—highlighted by public hearings and a bi-partisan conference committee—produced a balanced budget on-time, Republican Senators held the budget up for 52 days. The budget that was held up also included the largest budget reserve in the history of the state. And it included no new taxes.
The 14 Senators blocking the budget not only wanted massive cuts in spending, they also wanted to leverage issues that were not even included in the budget, such as Attorney General actions against local governments on the fight against global warming. At one point, they even wanted to get around voters’ disapproval of parental notification for teens receiving reproductive health services.
As chair of both the Assembly Budget Committee and the Joint Conference Committee that completed the on-time legislative budget, our committees conducted a six-month public process on each of the thousands of pieces of the budget. The process begins following the governor’s January presentation of his proposed budget, concludes in June, and includes approximately 150 bi-partisan budget committee and subcommittee hearings held in the Assembly and the Senate.
Even though Republicans were in the room and at the table for every stage of the public process, they chose not to make their demands until after the process was over—and their demands could be made in private negotiations without the benefit of a public hearing. That is unfair to anyone who wants the process to be transparent and done entirely in the light of day.
Following demands made by the Senators who blocked passage of the budget and using his line-item veto powers, the governor has vetoed $700 million from the budget—cuts beyond the Republican-Democratic compromise reached in the Assembly in July.
The governor’s vetoes ran across the budget, and included eliminating funds for the homeless mentally ill; adult protective services (which assist adults who are dependent, abused or have dementia- or Alzheimer's-related issues); state parks maintenance and acquisition; fish and game wardens; public libraries statewide; and community college basic skills courses.
The Governor also removed some of the last money destined to go to public transit from so-called gas tax “spillover” funds. Without these funds, transit systems across the state face the possibility of cutting bus routes and raises rates.
The impact of the transit cuts go beyond the obvious ones, such as those who depend on public transit to get around and worse traffic congestion. These cuts also impact our fight against global warming because investing in public transit is widely accepted as a key strategy for reducing greenhouse gases.
It is time to reform this process. While it’s fine to have a two-thirds vote to change taxes, a simple majority vote on the budget would allow us to have a much better chance at an on-time, coherent budget each year. It’s frustrating to do the job and do it on-time, and have the public be dissatisfied with all legislators because a minority of them block final action. Forty-seven other states, the U.S. Congress, and every city and county adopt a budget with a simple majority. So should the state. We’d be better off for it.
Comments
Post a comment
Get Email Updates
Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.
© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.
