- HOME
- About
- Topics
- Angelides
- Arnold Schwarzenegger
- California Attorney General Race
- California Congressional Races
- California Democratic Party
- California Governor Race 2010
- California Legislative Races
- California Lt. Governor Race
- California Secretary of State Race
- California State Budget
- California State Controller
- Campaign Finance Reform
- Campaigns
- Cell Phones
- Children and Families
- Consumer Rights
- Corporate Accountability
- Criminal Justice
- Death With Dignity
- Disaster Preparation
- Discrimination and Civil Rights
- Economy/ Economic Crisis
- Education
- Elections and Voting
- Electoral College
- Energy
- Environment
- Farm Animal Cruelty Ballot Measure
- Flood Control
- Food Safety
- Gas Prices
- Governor's Election Race
- Gun control
- Health Care
- Health Insurance
- Hiram Johnson's Corner
- Housing
- Human Rights
- Humor
- Immigration
- Infrastructure
- Initiative Reform
- Insurance Commissioner Race
- Labor
- Language and Politics
- Legal System
- Media and Communication
- Minimum Wage
- Open Government
- Pharmaceutical Companies
- Politics
- Preschool
- Presidential Election 2008
- Prevention of Farm Animal Cruelty Act Prop
- Prison Reform
- Privacy
- Privitization
- Prop 11-Redistricting/Reapportionment
- Prop 12--Veterans Housing Bond
- Prop 1A--High Speed Rail
- Prop 2--Treatment of Farm Animals
- Prop 3-Children's Hospital Bonds
- Prop 4 Waiting Period and Parental Notification
- Prop 5--Non-violent drug offenses
- Prop 6--Police and law enforcement spending
- Prop 7 and 10-Alternative Fuel and Energy Bond
- Prop 8 and-Marriage Equality
- Prop 85 Parental Notification
- Prop 86 Tobacco Tax
- Prop 87--Alternative Energy
- Prop 9 Parole
- Prop 90
- Prop 91--Transportation Funding
- Prop 92- Community Colleges
- Prop 93--Term Limits
- Props 94-97--Tribal Gaming
- Props 98 and 99
- Racial Disparities
- Responsible Lending
- Retirement Benefits
- Site of the Day
- Solar Initiative
- Structure of California Government
- Taxes
- Toxic Chemicals
- Transportation/Transit
- Water
- Westly
- Workers' Compensation
- Stories
- Proposition 1B: Restoration of Education Funding – NO
- Cavala: Jack D. Maltester – Exemplar of Public Life
- Cal-Cobra Premium Assistance Passes Senate Floor With Bipartisan Support
- Senate Approves Sen. Romero’s Bill Increasing Transparency in Education Policy
- Proposition 1A: State Budget Stabilization – YES
- Local School District Receive Solar Grant
- $634 Million Coming To California For Special Education
- Essay Seven: Props 1D, 1E and 1F
- Running the Show with Wonks and Gurus
- California Needs Propositions 1a-1f to Protect Schools, Health Care And Public Safety From Devastating Cuts And Layoffs
- 33rd California Peace Officers Memorial Ceremony: With Duty and Honor
- Essay Six: Props 1A, 1B and 1C
- Directory
- Donate
- Contact Us
RSS Advertise Here
Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.
Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.
Our latest headlines
- The Black-White Fallacy of Public Option
- Targeting Obesity Remains A Priority in Tough Budget Times
- Thousands Speak Out Against CA’s Costly and Broken Death Penalty
- Cuts Would Jeopardize Well-Being of Many Disabled Citizens
- Fully Fund Our Schools
- Same Governor, Different Goals
- Assemblymember Evans Sets the Record Straight
About Us
David Greenwald, Editor. (Contact David.)
CFC Education Foundation, Publisher. (Contact us.)
Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column?
Contact David here.
About California Progress Report.
Founded by Frank D. Russo (Publisher and Editor, 2006-08).
Sponsors
Books
Will the California PUC Provide All Telephone Consumers Equal Protection on Friday?
By Richard Holober
Executive Director
Consumer Federation of California
When AT&T, Sprint, Verizon and T-Mobile look at our state’s growing immigrant population, they see one thing – money, and lots of it.
These corporations spend a fortune advertising their products in Spanish, Mandarin, Tagalog and other non-English languages. You can’t blame them. After all, 40% of Californians speak a language other than English at home, according to the 2000 US Census.
But when it comes time to close the deal with a non-English speaking customer, the big phone companies don’t want to put their verbal promises in writing in a language that the customer can read.
It’s tough enough for an English professor to understand the fine print in a cell phone contract. For the one in five Californians who have difficulty understanding English, it’s out of the question.
On Friday, the California Public Utilities Commission will vote on regulations to protect telephone consumers who make their purchase in a language other than English.
The PUC’s draft provides meager consumer rights. The draft does not require a telephone company to provide a contract and summary of key terms and rates at the point of sale in the language used to advertise and consummate the deal. Instead, it allows phone companies to provide this “in-language” contract information through any two of these methods: on a website, through a recorded phone message, in the mail ten days after a contract is signed, or by calling a live customer service representative. These options are available only after the contract is signed, leaving limited-English consumers with the burden of requesting or finding the information, and then having to cancel a contract if they find they were victims of bait and switch sales tactics.
The big phone companies seem to have convinced the California Public Utilities Commission that the costs of translation services are unfairly burdensome. We believe that any company that can spend tens of millions of dollars a year advertising and selling in a non-English language can pick up the few bucks it would cost to translate the contract into that same language and give it to the customer when it makes the sale.
Requiring a contract in the same language used to pitch a product is nothing new. California law already requires “in-language” contracts for an automobile purchase or lease, time share, prepaid phone calling card, insurance product or annuity. Translation requirements haven’t caused these industries to go bankrupt.
The cell phone industry is the number one industry for consumer complaints logged by the Better Business Bureau year after year. Difficult to read contracts and bills are common complaints. These difficulties are compounded for non-English and limited-English consumers.
On Friday, we ask the California Public Utilities Commission to take the side of consumer rights. The PUC should strengthen its proposed rules, and require phone companies to furnish the contract and a summary of rates and terms in the same language used for its sales materials at the point of sale. These companies make big profits running ads and hiring sales personnel to market in many languages spoken in California. All consumers need the protection of a readable document that spells out the company’s verbal commitments.
The Consumer Federation of California is a non-profit advocacy organization. Since 1960, the Consumer Federation of California has been a powerful voice for consumer rights. CFC campaigns for state and federal laws that place consumer protection ahead of corporate profit. Each year, CFC testifies before the California legislature on dozens of bills that affect millions of our state's consumers. CFC also appears before state agencies in support of consumer regulations.
Comments
Post a comment
Commenters: You must preview your comment before posting. And please only hit "Post" once; it may take a while, but your comment is being processed. Thanks.
Get Email Updates
Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.
© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.
