- HOME
- About
- Topics
- Angelides
- Arnold Schwarzenegger
- California Attorney General Race
- California Congressional Races
- California Democratic Party
- California Governor Race 2010
- California Legislative Races
- California Lt. Governor Race
- California Secretary of State Race
- California State Budget
- California State Controller
- Campaign Finance Reform
- Campaigns
- Cell Phones
- Children and Families
- Consumer Rights
- Corporate Accountability
- Criminal Justice
- Death With Dignity
- Disaster Preparation
- Discrimination and Civil Rights
- Economy/ Economic Crisis
- Education
- Elections and Voting
- Electoral College
- Energy
- Environment
- Farm Animal Cruelty Ballot Measure
- Flood Control
- Food Safety
- Gas Prices
- Governor's Election Race
- Gun control
- Health Care
- Health Insurance
- Hiram Johnson's Corner
- Housing
- Human Rights
- Humor
- Immigration
- Infrastructure
- Initiative Reform
- Insurance Commissioner Race
- Labor
- Language and Politics
- Legal System
- Media and Communication
- Minimum Wage
- Open Government
- Pharmaceutical Companies
- Politics
- Preschool
- Presidential Election 2008
- Prevention of Farm Animal Cruelty Act Prop
- Prison Reform
- Privacy
- Privitization
- Prop 11-Redistricting/Reapportionment
- Prop 12--Veterans Housing Bond
- Prop 1A--High Speed Rail
- Prop 2--Treatment of Farm Animals
- Prop 3-Children's Hospital Bonds
- Prop 4 Waiting Period and Parental Notification
- Prop 5--Non-violent drug offenses
- Prop 6--Police and law enforcement spending
- Prop 7 and 10-Alternative Fuel and Energy Bond
- Prop 8 and-Marriage Equality
- Prop 85 Parental Notification
- Prop 86 Tobacco Tax
- Prop 87--Alternative Energy
- Prop 9 Parole
- Prop 90
- Prop 91--Transportation Funding
- Prop 92- Community Colleges
- Prop 93--Term Limits
- Props 94-97--Tribal Gaming
- Props 98 and 99
- Racial Disparities
- Responsible Lending
- Retirement Benefits
- Site of the Day
- Solar Initiative
- Structure of California Government
- Taxes
- Toxic Chemicals
- Transportation/Transit
- Water
- Westly
- Workers' Compensation
- Stories
- Proposition 1B: Restoration of Education Funding – NO
- Cavala: Jack D. Maltester – Exemplar of Public Life
- Cal-Cobra Premium Assistance Passes Senate Floor With Bipartisan Support
- Senate Approves Sen. Romero’s Bill Increasing Transparency in Education Policy
- Proposition 1A: State Budget Stabilization – YES
- Local School District Receive Solar Grant
- $634 Million Coming To California For Special Education
- Essay Seven: Props 1D, 1E and 1F
- Running the Show with Wonks and Gurus
- California Needs Propositions 1a-1f to Protect Schools, Health Care And Public Safety From Devastating Cuts And Layoffs
- 33rd California Peace Officers Memorial Ceremony: With Duty and Honor
- Essay Six: Props 1A, 1B and 1C
- Directory
- Donate
- Contact Us
RSS Advertise Here
Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.
Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.
Our latest headlines
- The Black-White Fallacy of Public Option
- Targeting Obesity Remains A Priority in Tough Budget Times
- Thousands Speak Out Against CA’s Costly and Broken Death Penalty
- Cuts Would Jeopardize Well-Being of Many Disabled Citizens
- Fully Fund Our Schools
- Same Governor, Different Goals
- Assemblymember Evans Sets the Record Straight
About Us
David Greenwald, Editor. (Contact David.)
CFC Education Foundation, Publisher. (Contact us.)
Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column?
Contact David here.
About California Progress Report.
Founded by Frank D. Russo (Publisher and Editor, 2006-08).
Sponsors
Books
Governor Backs Out of Deal to Not Test 7 Year Olds in California
By Jackie Goldberg
Teacher
Former Member of the California Assembly
NO 2nd Grade Testing!
A couple of years back, while I was Chair of the Assembly Education Committee, we made a deal with the Governor. And now, he wants to back out of it! I guess that should come as no surprise, since he seems to only make deals for a short term gain, and chooses not to follow through with the parts he doesn't like.
The deal was that the budget would pass and with it would be a commitment that California would end testing seven year olds with high stakes, standardized tests.
Why did the legislative majority require California to get out of the business of "testing" seven year olds? Was it because we don't want them to learn? Is it because we don't think they can learn? Or is it that we just don't want to hold teachers and schools "accountable"?
Well, actually, it is not for any of those alleged reasons. We, as a legislative body, decided that labeling very young children as "failures" was probably not going to help them love learning, and was indeed cruel and unusual punishment.
Those who understand child development know that there are individual developmental issues for children under age 9. What that means is that if a child is not doing well on a particular skill or test, until about nine years of age, there are physiological developments that occur at different times for different children. You know this already if you are a parent. One child holds a pencil and draws well at an earlier age than another child. One child learns to roller skate before another child of the same age. We don't call the later developing child a "failure" or "far below basic" as we so nicely put it in California.
But even if we don't care about developmental issues, we shouldn't test seven year olds because they are too young and immature to deal with this pressure. I saw one 2nd grade boy curl up on the floor under his desk, and just stay there until the testing was over. Another, high achieving girl in the same class "wet herself" and had to go to the nurse's office to change clothes because, as the teacher put it, the girl "knew what was at stake." Imagine a seven year old girl having to worry about "what is at stake"!
But now, as the budget delay has lead to the usual "swapping" of everything the different negotiating parties want, the Governor seems to be insisting that we go back to "torturing " the very young. And this is in spite of the fact the No Child Left Behind does NOT require the testing of second graders. I suspect it is not required because they know the test results may be meaningless by the end of the following year for a great many children.
You can make the difference! A few newspaper editorial boards have been convinced by the lobbyists for those who make and sell these tests to California, that it is just too late to wait until third grade to test. And these no-nothing editors have supported putting the test back into the budget. Please call and write your State Senator and your State Assembly Member, and tell them NOT to agree to adding money to this budget to keep testing companies happy, while hurting young California children. Your voice can influence the Democratic leadership.
And they can say there just isn't enough money to pay for the harm done by this wrong headed notion of so-called accountability. Tell them that if they want to know how each child is doing, let each district buy an off-the-shelf diagnostic test that is scored at the school, and tell the third grade teacher where each child is weak and where he or she is strong. That will help the teachers prepare these impressionable young children for the 3rd grade standardized, high stakes tests.
TAKE ACTION: Make the call, write, e-mail, or fax both your elected representatives and the Governor. And do it today.
Before being termed-out of office, Goldberg served six years in the California Assembly and Chaired the Assembly Committee on Education. Prior to that, she served on the School Board for the LA Unified School District for 8 years, LA City Council for 8 years, and has been a high school teacher for 18 years. This article originally appeared on the website of Speak Out California Speak Out California and is republished with her permission.
Comments
Post a comment
Commenters: You must preview your comment before posting. And please only hit "Post" once; it may take a while, but your comment is being processed. Thanks.
Get Email Updates
Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.
© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.
