Advertise Here
Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.
Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.
Our latest headlines
- Weekly Radio Address: Assembly Lead Water Negotiators Huffman, Caballero Discuss this Week’s Historic Agreement to Solve California’s Water Crisis
- Feinstein Once Again Flirts With Entering the Governor’s Race
- A Good Health Care Bill Emerging from the House
- Schwarzenegger Applauds Passage of Peripheral Canal/Dams Water Package
- "Historic" Water Deal Draws Both Praise and Criticism
- Republican State Senators Vote for Administrative Chaos, Backdoor Cuts in IHSS
- Assembly Budget Committee Follow-up Informational Hearing on Implementation on IHSS Program Changes
About Us
David Greenwald, Editor. (Contact David.)
CFC Education Foundation, Publisher. (Contact us.)
Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column?
Contact David here.
About California Progress Report.
Founded by Frank D. Russo (Publisher and Editor, 2006-08).
Sponsors
Books
California Republican Senators Target Kids of Welfare Recipients and Public Transit for Biggest Proposed Budget Cuts

By Hayley Leventhal
Reporter
California Progress Report
Despite the expectations, the California Senate met for mere minutes this morning, just long enough to postpone any vote on the state budget another day. Republicans, who were given four days to propose a budget of their own, provided only a list of possible cuts. Their proposal has not yet been written in bill form that can be voted on, but is expected to be presented tomorrow morning when the Senate reconvenes at 9 a.m.
Senate President pro Tempore Don Perata (D- Alameda) took the unusual step Saturday morning when he asked the Republicans in his house to draft an alternative budget, saying he was tired of "the goal posts being moved" and not being able to tell what exactly the Republican Senators were proposing. The budget bill passed by the Assembly early Friday morning, as well as all of the 15 "trailer bills" associated with it, did not receive a single vote of support from Republican Senators. In response, Perata proverbially passed the ball into the Republicans’ court, saying that “we’ve put our votes up.”
In a letter to Senate Republican Leader Dick Ackerman (R- Irvine), Perata wrote “Candidly, for weeks, we have been unable to understand what you want… you have raised new policy and language concerns with the budget each time all of your previous issues have been resolved… It has become clear that Senate Democrats and our Republican Governor can’t continue to guess at what might meet your objectives.”
Perata asked the Republican caucus needs to propose a budget and trailer bills that would be supported by all 15 Republican Senators, as well as 12 Democratic Senators to achieve the necessary two-thirds vote of 27 Senators out of the 40 member body. This will be difficult for Ackerman to achieve, considering Republican Senator Tom McClintock (R- Thousand Oaks) has never once voted for a budget in his Senate career, and perhaps in his many years in the Assembly. A full Senate Republican caucus has not been able to meet on the new proposal because of absences or scheduling conflicts.
In less than 20 minutes this morning, California Republican Senators talked about possible reductions of $842 million out of the budget. The biggest of the cuts, according to their information sheet, are $300 million taken from the CalWORKs program that take money from the children of non compliant adults who receive no money themselves. The current CalWORKs welfare plan, Republican Senator George Runner (R- Antelope Valley) said, offers more benefits than the state should offer. “Why would taxpayers want a ‘gold-plated’ system when California is in the red?” he asked.
The CalWORKs program was a bipartisan reform by Republican Governor Wilson and the legislature in 1997 that was designed to place a safety net under children even if their parents or custodians were not complying with all of the provisions of the law. Republican Senators framed the changes they are seeking as limiting of “non-compliant recipients,” described as “fleeing felons, non citizens and those who fail to comply with basic requirements." Children, including those whose parents have exhausted their five years of eligibility will be among those losing state assistance.
Marty Omoto, Director of the California Disabilities Community Action Network, noted that many children with special needs are in the CalWORKs program. Other groups are also opposing these new Republican budget proposals, including the Western Center on Law and Poverty, and the California Council for the Blind.
Scott Graves, a Senior Policy Analyst of The California Budget Project (CBP), told reporters this afternoon that while the cuts to CalWORKs may offer short term reductions to the budget, long term costs may simply be shifted to other programs, such as foster care and child welfare services.
Perata denounced the proposal, saying that it punishes children for their parents’ actions.
The Republicans also proposed an additional $100 million cut from public transit funds. Public transit funds were already subjected to a reduction of $1.3 billion demanded by Assembly Republicans before they would provide the votes to pass the Assembly. This money comes from what is known as the “spillover account”, a fund which grows when gasoline prices increase. The “spillover account” is used to offset some of the increase in fuel prices that public transit agencies, including bus services, have to pay.
Transit groups, and their allies, the California Public Interest Research Group, League of Conservation Voters, and Transportation and Land Use Coalition are strongly opposed to further reductions, casting further doubt that the Senate as a whole will vote for these cuts, which go further than ones previously proposed by Govenror Schwarzenegger.
Also proposed will be an elimination of all state funding for Proposition 36, the voter passed program to fund drug treatment programs rather than incarceration for simple possession of drugs, This would reduce the budget by $120 million. “To the extent counties believe this is a worthwhile effort,” the proposal says, “they can pay for it.” A lawsuit is pending in Alameda County over prior cuts to this program because it was passed as an initiative and is state law. A preliminary injunction was issued earlier this year by a Superior Court judge against cuts in funding and that case is expected to go to trial.
The complete list of proposed cuts can be viewed online at the Senate Republican Caucus site.
Normally cordial relations in the Senate are showing signs of fraying as the two parties are at loggerheads in budget negotiations. Before presenting the Democratic approved budget Friday, Perata told reporters that the budget was a bipartisan effort, saying that “the Democrats have come a long way with the Republicans.”
This morning, after hearing the Republican’s proposed cuts, Perata told reporters that “a handful of right-wing Republicans” are to blame for the lack of a budget. “We’re being held hostage to a very narrow ideology,” he said, “all I know is that I’m not going to be terrorized by ideologues and California shouldn’t be either.”

Republican Dave Cox (R- Fair Oaks) (pictured at right) responded, saying “I want to show you what a terrorist looks like.” At this point, he held up a photo of Osama Bin Ladin. “We are not terrorists,” he said, “We are Senate Republicans.”
The cuts proposed by Republican Senators are those that were not up for negotiation anymore, Perata said. “They couldn’t get it in the negotiating table; they’re getting it this way.” He described the Republicans’ efforts to revisit past proposals, saying, “There’s no order. Chaos. Anarchy.”
“We’re not late to the table, they just didn’t listen before.” Senator Runner responded. “Now they have to listen.”
The Democrats will most likely vote against the Republican’s proposed budget if it is presented tomorrow morning. Many of the Democratic Senators feel that the Assembly passed budget has cut too many funds already, and are unlikely to vote for the Republican’s more extreme cuts. Senate Majority Leader Gloria Romero (D- Los Angeles), said of the Assembly’s passed budget, “As it is now, as we propose it, it’s not exactly a kind budget.”
“Two people in California are holding up the state budget.” she said, referring to the two Republican Senate votes needed to pass the Assembly’s budget.
Jean Ross, Executive Director of the CBP, told reporters that the proposed cuts are “proof positive that there are no new ideas in terms of balancing the budget.” The legislature has seen all of the proposed cuts before, in one form or another, and almost all of them have been rejected, Ross said.
Hayley Leventhal is a summer intern with the California Progress Report as part of the University of California Sacramento Center Public-Affairs Journalism Program. She is a senior at the University of California, Berkeley, where she is majoring in political science. Leventhal is a native of Santa Cruz, where she attended Cabrillo College before enrolling at UC-Berkeley. She was active in Cabrillo College Democrats and as a 2004 campaign volunteer for Moveon.org.
Comments
So what's so wrong about cutting welfare? I have 4 foster children in our care and all the moms are on welfare and having more kids. Cut the welfare off after 5 years! No more paying medical costs for having more kids. What is wrong with you people?
Posted by: steve at July 30, 2007 05:38 AM
What's wrong with us is that we don't think taking assistance away from children is an appropriate way to punish their parents, even in the extreme case of welfare system abuse.
Posted by: Hayley Leventhal at July 30, 2007 02:08 PM
right wing republicans are not to blame for this "supposed" crisis in californias budget. i was born here 53 years ago, our schools were better,water and services were better and on and on... ! bottom line is the taxpayers are sick to death of having to foot the bill for all the dead beats who can't pull their own weight! usually it's the people who don't pay that much or anything at all who think it's ok to mooch off the state,selfishly not caring that the funding comes from all the hard working people of this great state! we californians are sick and tired of the"perceived" LAZY state workers.those of us who actually "THINK' know that less government intrusion into the citizens lives increases our living QUALITY of our lives! STOP BLAMING THE TAXPAYERS WHO SAY ENOUGH ALREADY!
Posted by: richard Gingras at February 17, 2009 04:48 AM
right wing republicans are not to blame for this "supposed" crisis in californias budget. i was born here 53 years ago, our schools were better,water and services were better and on and on... ! bottom line is the taxpayers are sick to death of having to foot the bill for all the dead beats who can't pull their own weight! usually it's the people who don't pay that much or anything at all who think it's ok to mooch off the state,selfishly not caring that the funding comes from all the hard working people of this great state! we californians are sick and tired of the"perceived" LAZY state workers.those of us who actually "THINK' know that less government intrusion into the citizens lives increases our living QUALITY of our lives! STOP BLAMING THE TAXPAYERS WHO SAY ENOUGH ALREADY!
Posted by: richard Gingras at February 17, 2009 04:49 AM
right wing republicans are not to blame for this "supposed" crisis in californias budget. i was born here 53 years ago, our schools were better,water and services were better and on and on... ! bottom line is the taxpayers are sick to death of having to foot the bill for all the dead beats who can't pull their own weight! usually it's the people who don't pay that much or anything at all who think it's ok to mooch off the state,selfishly not caring that the funding comes from all the hard working people of this great state! we californians are sick and tired of the"perceived" LAZY state workers.those of us who actually "THINK' know that less government intrusion into the citizens lives increases our living QUALITY of our lives! STOP BLAMING THE TAXPAYERS WHO SAY ENOUGH ALREADY!
Posted by: richard Gingras at February 17, 2009 04:50 AM
I think that anyone who does not have an extreme physical or mental disability and who is on welfare should have to report to a work site if they expect to get a welfare check. Perhaps they can work 5 hours per day. They could work at a hotel, restaurant or farm. People should work if they are to receive any money. That way it doesn't have to be called welfare. Instead the benefits could be called workfare. I think that's fair.
Posted by: Y. Purseglove at July 31, 2009 11:09 AM
Sorry, comments are temporarily disabled. We're doing a bit of server maintenance on the commenting area. We'll be back up and running shortly. Thank you for your patience.
Get Email Updates
Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.
© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.
RSS 