Advertise Here
Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.
Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.
Our latest headlines
- Attorney General Brown Announces Largest Predatory Lending Settlement in History: $8.68 Billion in Home Loans and Foreclosures Relief Nationally—Up to $3.5 Billion to Californians—From Countrywide Financial Corporation
- Hannah-Beth Jackson Has the Goods on Tony Strickland in Pivotal California Senate Seat Race
- Proposition 5: We Need to Fix the Drug Court System
- Turning a Red California District Blue: Is the Third Time a Charm for Ferial Masry and the Sixth Seat for Democrats to Gain Two-Thirds in the Assembly?
- The Heller Gun Decision Week 14 – The U.S. Senate Holds H.R. 6842 and California Holds SB 327
- Cavala: Competitive Legislative Seats Do Not Produce “Moderate” Lawmakers
- In California’s 5th Senate District Race Democrat Wolk Should Win
About Us
The California Progress Report is published by Frank D. Russo, a longtime observer of and participant in California politics.
About Frank Russo.
About California Progress Report.
Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column? Contact Frank here.
Sponsors
Books
Bill to Gut Local Campaign Finance Laws Blasted by League of Women Voters, Common Cause, and California Clean Money Campaign

By Ned Wigglesworth
Policy Advocate
California Common Cause
The California state legislature stands poised to approve a bill that would wrest control of local elections from cities and counties and vitiate local laws designed to check the financial influence of special interests in local elections. The bill, AB 1430, would prohibit local jurisdictions from regulating the source and amount of money that political parties can use to campaign for candidates – even though the state legislature does the exact same thing for state elections.
Jacqueline Jacobberger, President of the League of Women Voters of California says: “This bill is an end run around local campaign finance laws and a gift to special interests who want to dominate local elections with big contributions. A move like this will only feed voters’ cynicism about the legislature, undermining the appreciation the public has had for the recent accomplishments of their elected representatives. It seems counter to the spirit of the political reforms that legislators are considering this year.”
The California Clean Money Campaign, California Common Cause, and League of Women Voters of California oppose AB 1430 for the following reasons:
1. AB 1430 would prevent cities and counties from enacting any laws that would restrict the funneling of large contributions through political parties to benefit candidates – even when the candidate, party, and donor coordinate the payment and expenditure. Without such safeguards, local contribution limits would be rendered meaningless. Contribution limits are a fundamental and constitutional means that cities and counties can and do use to prevent corruption and the appearance of corruption in their elections. AB 1430 would create an enormous loophole in these laws, allowing special interest groups to use large campaign contributions to dominate city elections and exert undue influence over city officials.
2. The right of cities and counties to regulate their own elections is enshrined in the state constitution and Political Reform Act. AB 1430 threatens to abridge these rights, substituting the view of the state legislature for that of voters and local officials as to what campaign finance laws best meet the needs of local jurisdictions. This is why the ethics commissions of San Diego, Los Angeles, and San Francisco all either oppose or have asked their city council to oppose AB 1430, and the San Diego Union Tribune and Los Angeles Times have editorialized against the bill as well.
What exactly is the problem this bill is intended to address? The state legislature has passed the exact same law which they would prohibit cities and counties from adopting and enforcing with this bill. If this is truly about ‘free speech’, how come the legislature isn’t holding itself to the same standard?
AB 1430 has passed the Assembly and is scheduled to be heard in the Senate Elections Committee on July 10. The League of Women Voters of California, California Common Cause, and the California Clean Money Campaign are urging the members of the Senate Elections Committee to vote against this bill.
Other resources:
San Diego Union Tribune -- No on AB 1430 Editorial (6/22)
Los Angeles Times -- No on AB 1430 (6/19)
Ned Wigglesworth, joined Common Cause as a policy advocate earlier this year, after working as a corporate lawyer, bartender and creative writer. From these experiences and his time spent growing up on a sheep farm in Kansas, Ned brings a common-sense populist perspective to the problem of big money in politics.
Comments
Ned (and Frank R. and Bill C.) - glad to see you have
posted this article. I agree with it. Now, do I read it saying that some cities have not gotton into campaign regulations much yet? And AB 1430 aims to restrict them from doing just that. Ugh. Taking the "right" away from citizens? no way. The Legislature should bury it, or let it sit in committee as one could say.
Larry Gallup
Posted by: Larry K. Gallup at July 2, 2007 06:09 PM
Under the guise of "reform", San Diego adopted contribution limits which make it impossible for any but the personally wealthy or those who are the candidates of the personally wealthy to run competitive campaigns.
Allowing political parties a free hand in support of their candidates is a poor paliative - but the only one available to most Democratic candidates.
This legislation should be passed.
Posted by: william cavala at July 5, 2007 08:21 AM
Post a comment
Get Email Updates
Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.
© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.
RSS 