Advertise Here
Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.
Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.
Our latest headlines
- The Black-White Fallacy of Public Option
- Targeting Obesity Remains A Priority in Tough Budget Times
- Thousands Speak Out Against CA’s Costly and Broken Death Penalty
- Cuts Would Jeopardize Well-Being of Many Disabled Citizens
- Fully Fund Our Schools
- Same Governor, Different Goals
- Assemblymember Evans Sets the Record Straight
About Us
David Greenwald, Editor. (Contact David.)
CFC Education Foundation, Publisher. (Contact us.)
Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column?
Contact David here.
About California Progress Report.
Founded by Frank D. Russo (Publisher and Editor, 2006-08).
Sponsors
Books
The Debate on Senator Kuehl’s Universal Health Care Plan Which Passed California Senate Today
• SB840(Kuehl) clears Senate on a largely party-line vote
• Legislature slated to vote on leadership-sponsored health reform legislation Thursday
• Michael Moore to be present at Sacramento premier of “SiCKO”

By Anthony Wright
Executive Director of Health Access California
SB840, which would establish a single-payer health care system in California , passed the state Senate Wednesday 22-14, a near party-line vote.
Most Democratic Senators were in support. Democratic Senators Denise Ducheny and Mike Machado, both serving on the Budget Conference Committee, were not present when the vote was taken. Lou Correa, D-Anaheim, voted “no’’ on the measure.
It’s the fifth year in a row that Sen. Sheila Kuehl, of Santa Monica , has introduced the measure, which she considers the “gold-standard” for health care reform. While Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed the measure last year, she has said she wants to continue to organize the movement, and holds out hope that she can convince him otherwise.
DEBATE
In the staid Senate, there was little debate on the measure. Being its fifth time around the block, Capitol watchers expect nothing other than a party-line (or near party-line) vote on the measure.
However, Sen. Sam Aanestad, R-Grass Valley , did take the opportunity to attack the nationalized health care systems of other countries.
“There’s no question that we have problems with the high cost of health care, but to say we have the lowest standard of health care, or that we’re at the bottom of industrialized nations is not a true statement,’’ Aanestad said.
Contrary to what Aanestad said, though, the U.S. spends more on health care, but gets less, according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. The latest numbers show that the U.S. spends $7,800 per capita on health care, nearly twice as much as Canada’s $4,050; the UK spends $3,250. Meanwhile, the US ranks 21st in life expectancy (Canada ranks 7th and the UK ranks 18th), and 23rd in infant mortality behind Canada and the UK .
Aanestad went on to say that the “the only universal health care ... (seen) in the US is the outmoded and substandard Veterans Administration Health Care system. Do you really want your American health care to end up in the Veterans’ Administration model?”
Lastly, Aanestad proclaimed that “if I needed bypass surgery, I could not get it (in Canada) because I’m over 60 years old and I would be put on a waiting list because I’m too old to qualify for bypass surgery.’’ On the other hand, in the U.S. “If I needed bypass surgery, I’d have it tonight,’’ he said.
Sen. Kuehl contradicted this statement.
“This notion that waiting lists exists somewhere else, but not in America ? Maybe for the privileged few of us who can get right in. But there are a lot of people in my district – the richest district in the state and the one with probably the highest number of people insured – who are still on waiting lists, whether with Kaiser, or with Blue Cross,’’ said Kuehl, who represents Santa Monica.
“You can’t just run right in and get your bypass surgery,’’ Kuehl said.
Sen. Joe Simitian, D-Palo Alto, quoted Walter Cronkite’s description of the “health care system,’’ saying “I don’t know why we call it a health care system. It isn’t healthy. It isn’t caring, and it sure as hell isn’t a system.’’
Simitian stated that he wasn't sure that a single-payer solution was the only or best solution, versus other ideas. But, he said, the author's efforts on SB840 helped bring about this year's focus on health reform, and “whether or not I believe it is the best way or only way, I do believe it’s an important way to get to some meaningful solutions for the 4.5 to 6 million Californians who are without health insurance on any given day.’’
Kuehl closed debate on her bill by referring to “a truly American’’ single-payer system: Medicare.
“If it weren’t for Medicare, a truly American comprehensive system, we would be frightened in my age cohort (she’s 66) and above.’’
That’s because insurance companies have become “very creative in denying care’’ dropping patients when they are sick, or rejecting consumers who apply for policies simply because they’ve had a history of taking certain prescription drugs in a time long ago.
The passage of Kuehl’s bill marks the first of a series of health-reform related bills that must be passed out of the Senate and Assembly this week.
OTHER HEALTH BILLS AND EVENTS.
AB8 (Nunez) and SB48 (Perata), which both aim to expand health coverage by relying on the existing system of employer-based insurance, is expected to be heard Thursday. Several other health-related bills must also pass a floor vote by Friday in order to be further considered this year.
The passage of Kuehl’s bill and consideration of the leadership proposals also serve as a prelude to Michael Moore’s new movie SiCKO, about the failures in the American health care system, which is expected to premiere in Sacramento on Tuesday, with the documentary film maker testifying before Kuehl’s committee next week.
We will provide updates on both legislation, Moore’s testimony and movie in the upcoming days.
Health Access California is a statewide health care consumer advocacy coalition of over 200 groups.
Comments
Excuse me, but when did Senator Kuehl become a physician? Last I heard, she was a child acting star out of the sixties.
For you to openly ridicule the ONLY physician in the State Senate, Sam Aanestad, shows how biased you really are.
Fact is, Senator Aanestad is far more in touch with the medical community and medical issues than Senator Kuehl will ever be. He knows single payer health would be a huge mistake, and he understands the disadvantages to universal care.
Rather than chide him for his expertise, perhaps you should closely listen to what he has to say. His comments are not out of spite. They are out of experience.
I, for one, would listen.
Posted by: Medical Professional at June 7, 2007 10:51 AM
Sen. Aanestad (Republican, District 4) represents far fewer people than Sen. Kuehl. His district is a predominantly rural area, sparsely populated except for bears and deer. I find his comments about universal healthcare totally antiquated, irresponsible and quite frankly, exactly what one would expect from a good-old-boy party-line Republican. I am beginning to wonder if *any* Republicans have warm blood running through their veins instead of ice water. If they did, more would support Kuehl's SB 840.
Posted by: Medicare for All advocate at June 7, 2007 05:27 PM
Funny thing to me is that IF Republicans oppose any government funded health care, why would they have tolerated Medicare these past few years they have controlled Congress? Could it be they realize what would happen to them if advocated it's dismantling?
As for me I have never met a Canadian who hates theire system. They always look kind of puzzled at me and I hear quite often that many folks up their think we are being made out for fools by some people saying Canada is terrible when you consider thier health care system. They haven't REPEALED it have they?
How LONG has Canada had a single payer health care system? DECADES.
And we have three systems here in the US. WE have: SOCIALIZED MEDICING: The Veterans Heatlhcare (doctors work the state, hospitals owned by the state), a SINGLE PAYER SYSTEM (Medicare), and our PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE.
My advice? Do nothing and the numbers of uninsured and underinsured rise crashing the system and we get national single payer!
The cons are stalling and stalling this reform. It's like WANT National Health Care, HR676 to be adopted nationally!
Posted by: Nick Balandiat at June 8, 2007 07:13 AM
Hummmm, We are watching this Senate Bill 840 here in Flordia. Many of us like this idea, and we have a grass roots movement going on much like you began in California. Your success might be our success!
Surely the Federial Government will not move on this issue, and if they did it would be at the pace of a slothe.
Posted by: Ray Bruno at July 21, 2007 05:36 AM
Post a comment
Commenters: You must preview your comment before posting. And please only hit "Post" once; it may take a while, but your comment is being processed. Thanks.
Get Email Updates
Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.
© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.
RSS 