Advertise Here

Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.

Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.

Learn more about ads.

About Us

Frank D. Russo

The California Progress Report is published by Frank D. Russo, a longtime observer of and participant in California politics.

About Frank Russo.
About California Progress Report.

Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column? Contact Frank here.

Sponsors

Books

Schrag on Schwarzenegger at the Exact Midpoint of His Tenure as Governor--Is Our Action Figure Taking Care of California's Mundane Business?

Schrag.gif

By Peter Schrag

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger this week reached the exact midpoint of his scheduled seven years and 44 days in office. Not a bad moment to assess a tenure that's been almost as extraordinary, if not bizarre, as the way he achieved it.

For much of the past 18 months, he's gotten marks that have been as good as they were awful at the time of his special election disaster in November 2005. The national press loves him, a housebroken Republican who supports stem cell research, abortion rights, universal health care and, above all, recognizes the danger of global warming.

Last week, New York Times columnist Timothy Egan wrote a piece declaring that they could have used him at the G8 summit. Arnold, he said, has shown the rest of the world "that not all Americans are in the last century on the big issues of the day."

But if he's so today on the global stage, making clean air deals with Canadians and Brits -- "EuroArnold, at home in the pragmatic politics of Tony Blair (and German Chancellor Angela) Merkel," as Egan put it -- the mundane affairs of the state he's supposed to govern and that he vowed to turn upside down look as tawdry as they did in 2003.

The big issues of the moment -- the budget, redistricting reform and term limits changes -- are a house of mirrors in which nothing is quite what it seems. Among the governor's budget solutions is to lease the state lottery to a private operator and sell EdFund, the state's student loan guarantee agency, to a private buyer for a quick billion to help reduce the deficit.

A private operator can run the lottery more efficiently, he argues, and increase per capita sales, which are low compared to most other states -- meaning it will bring more suckers into the tent where they'll drop their money on games rather than buying something useful. That could increase lottery revenues for schools, but since the lottery generates a bare 2 percent of the school budget, no increase means much.

Like his predecessor, he also proposes to "securitize" tobacco suit settlement money -- meaning that the state borrows against future revenues from the settlement and pays the lenders from those revenues. Is that what he meant when he promised to "tear up the credit card"?

The Legislature meanwhile is in heat about loosening term limits -- changing the law enacted by voters in 1990 from a limit of eight years in the Senate and six years in the Assembly to an advertised total of 12 years in whichever house.

But since it allows for a "transition" allowing any sitting legislator to serve 12 years in the house in which or she is now ensconced, it would give termed out Assembly members another six years and senators another four.

Among them: Senate President Pro Tem Don Perata, Assembly Speaker Fabian Núñez and that great conservative, Sen. Tom McClintock, who when he's termed out will have been in the Legislature for 22 years and is likely to remain there another four if the term limits change passes. Term limits was a dumb idea to begin with and, like a lot of such things, it has spawned a lot of dishonesty and more stupidity in its wake.

Meanwhile, the fight continues over that hardy perennial, redistricting reform. Schwarzenegger says he won't support the term limits measure, which is likely to be on the February presidential primary ballot, without reforms that would take the redistricting process out of the hands of the Legislature and give it to some nonpolitical group.

For the moment, all are on their best behavior. The legislators' desperate hope that the voters will allow them to keep their jobs a few more years greatly increases the chances that California will have a budget, if not on time, then before the end of this month, no matter how much it's laced with borrowing, asset sales and other gimmicks.

Delayed budgets, of course, mean very little except maybe to some state employees and vendors who have to wait for their money. But because it's a simple issue and the media make a big issue of it, budgets become a surrogate for effective government. Get the thing signed on time regardless of the collusion of fiscal irresponsibility that produces it, and it shows that Sacramento is working. Drag the process into August, and it proves the system is broken.

Meanwhile, the structural budget deficit runs to the horizon and beyond, the holes closed with borrowing (as usual), cuts in aid to the state's poorest workers, a shift of transportation money to the general fund and the one-time fixes and revenues from the sale of state assets.

But there'll be no re-examination of the imbalance between revenues and spending, which produces the deficit, no concern about the long-term fiscal impact of the borrowing and the other one-time fixes, just business as usual. Global warming and stem cells will always be a better show.

Peter Schrag is former editorial page editor of the Sacramento Bee. This article is published with his permission.

Posted on June 13, 2007

Comments

raaah darshh ahhh spagheetiii dooosh gar

Posted by: retardo disableas at July 2, 2007 10:48 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

Get email updates!

Get Email Updates

Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.



© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.

RSS

Stat tracker