Advertise Here

Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.

Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.

Our latest headlines

As Another Special Session on Budget Looms, Senator Asks if California Can “Bail Out Ourselves” By Retirement System Purchase of State’s Short-Term Debt
Schwarzenegger Thinks Jerry Brown Has Best Shot at Being Next California Governor if Obama Wins Presidency
Governor Schwarzenegger Should Call Special Session on California’s Mortgage and Foreclosure Crisis Linked to Our Budget Problems
If It Were up To Them We’d Still Be in the Depression
Schrag: The Problems with Prop 4 on Parental Notification
With Friends Like New York Times Columnists Thomas Friedman, Maureen Dowd And Frank Rich – Does Barack Obama Need Enemies?
California Budget Crisis – Again-- Possible Special Session on State Budget

About Us

The California Progress Report is published by Frank D. Russo, a longtime observer of and participant in California politics.

About Frank Russo.
About California Progress Report.

Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column? Contact Frank here.

Books

Deceptive Ad in Sacramento Bee by Washington DC-based Lobby Group Representing Detroit's Big Three Automakers as Assembly Revotes on Clean Car Discount Bill

By Dan Kalb
California Policy Coordinator
Union of Concerned Scientists

[Editor's note: A full-page ad from the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers has appeared in The Sacramento Bee. The misleading ad mentions the surcharges AB 493, being reconsidered today by the Assembly, would place on new highly polluting vehicles, but fails to include information on both the rebates the bill would deliver on new cleaner vehicles and the many new models that would fall into a "zero band" where neither a rebate nor a surcharge would apply.

According to an article in a yesterday's Detroit News, the alliance "may run additional radio or print ads later." (To see a copy of the ad, click here]

This is another dishonest campaign from an auto industry willing to deceive lawmakers and the public on legislation that could save people money and clean up the environment. Just two weeks ago, the auto companies' lobby group aired misleading radio ads about federal fuel economy legislation. Just last week, the alliance came to California to speak out against the Pavley clean car law. Now they're lying about the Clean Car Discount bill. The automakers have fallen into a sad pattern of using lawyers and slick public relations tactics to fight good laws instead of using their engineers to build cleaner cars.

Contrary to what the automakers say, the Clean Car Discount bill (AB 493) preserves consumer choice. To use the 2005 model year as an example, the Toyota RAV4 SUV would qualify for a nearly $900 rebate. The Honda CR-V and Ford Escape would qualify for rebates worth more than $300.

Several minivans, including the Dodge Caravan, Chrysler Town & Country and Honda Odyssey would fall into the zero band. The Regular Cab version of the Toyota Tacoma pickup would also fall into the zero band, while the Ford Ranger Regular Cab pickup would qualify for a rebate worth more than $350.

While the auto industry ad implies that there'd be a huge surcharge on a lot of vehicles, only the most highly polluting models, such as the Ford Excursion and Hummer H2 would incur the maximum surcharge of $2,500. The bill also waives surcharges for many small businesses, emergency responders, and low-income drivers.

This is a bill that can make cleaner cars more affordable for everybody. California has been leading the way on smart environmental legislation and it's a shame that automakers are trying to drag us backwards. People want cleaner cars, not dirty tricks.

Dan Kalb is the Union of Concerned Scientist's California policy coordinator.

Posted on June 07, 2007

Comments

After looking over the bill I did not notice any specific automobiles mentioned. I was wondering where you came up with the "2005 model." Maybe I skipped over the part of the bill you refer to. Eitherway, it would help a lot to see where your facts come from considering you are saying the ad in the Bee was deceptive.

Posted by: jack at June 7, 2007 12:36 PM

The on-line version of the Sac Bee article reporting on the advertisement included a chart of sample rebates and surcharges.
The Union of Concerned Scientists did an analysis of 2005 models (the most recent data available) and of the bill to determine the most likely rebates/surcharges based on GHG emissions.
-DK

Posted by: Dan Kalb at June 15, 2007 12:10 AM

Get Email Updates

Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.

Stat tracker