Advertise Here

Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.

Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.

Learn more about ads.

About Us

Frank D. Russo

The California Progress Report is published by Frank D. Russo, a longtime observer of and participant in California politics.

About Frank Russo.
About California Progress Report.

Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column? Contact Frank here.

Sponsors

Books

Analysis of New California Poll That Shows Clinton and Giuliani Still Leading in State's Presidential Primary--What Do the Numbers Really Mean?

Bush and Iraq Remain Toxic in California

frankrusso-small.jpg

By Frank D. Russo

The Survey and Policy Research Institute of San Jose State University, a respected and nonpartisan pollster, has just released a poll showing Hillary Clinton with a substantial lead (37%) over John Edwards and Barack Obama who both have 15% of the vote for the Democratic nomination for President in the February 5, 2008 election. On the Republican side, Rudolph Giuliani leads with 25% of the vote, with Fred Thompson, the new (and still technically "exploring" candidate) at 16%, edging out John McCain at 14% and within the margin of error of the poll. Mitt Romney trails badly at 5%.

Even though it is still early (the primary, even with it being advanced, is still 8 months away) and we haven't had a single vote in the states still ahead of us, the numbers tell an interesting story. Remembering that at this time in 2003, Kerry who decisively won the Democratic nomination for President, was languishing and all but given up for dead, here's what the numbers mean.

The Democratic Presidential Race in California

There's a huge gender gap here--18%. Clinton gets 45% of the women's vote and only 27% of the men's vote in this survey. If the election were held today, she would crush Obama at 13% and Edwards at 8% in the women's vote. This leads Phil Trounstine, the Director of the SPRI which conducted the poll to conclude: “Clinton is being swept along by her support among women. If Edwards, Obama or any other candidate can peel women away from Clinton, the Democrats could have a competitive race in California. But if Clinton keeps her grasp on women, it’s not going to be much of a contest here.”

Clinton has a narrow lead of 27% to Edwards' 24% and Obama's 14% in the men's vote.

Overall, 10% in the Democratic primary are supporting "other" candidates--those not in the top three and 13% are undecided. Much more of the men's responses (14%) than the women's (8%) indicate they are supporting these "other" candidates. But there are a lot more undecided women voters (26%) than there are men voters (18%). Almost a third of the voters expected to come to the polls in the Democratic primary are either undecided or supporting candidates who may not be in the running if they don't make substantial gains. That includes 41% of "independents" (remember, those not affiliated with a party--"decline-to-state voters") can participate in the election here--as opposed to the Republican Party primary where only those registered with the GOP can do so.

Given the polls that show there are gender gaps on the Iraq War with women more opposed and on other domestic issues where women are more liberal than men, can Edwards or Obama narrow the gap as the candidates' positions on these issues become better known to the voters?

While there are variations on the lead that Clinton has amongst the subcategories, she leads in all of them in this survey. She is ahead amongst liberals, moderates, conservatives, whites, non-whites, geographically, amongst union and non union homes, in all age groups, and in Democrats and Decline-To-State voters.

Obama does his best amongst the younger voters (up to age 34) and in the Bay Area. Edwards does his best among men and Los Angeles area voters. But even in these categories, Clinton leads.

The Republican Presidential Race in California

This is a very fluid race. Giuliani leads with 25% of the vote. But Fred Thompson has made a strong showing shortly after announcing he is exploring entering the race and has 16% of the vote to John McCain's 14%. The big loser appears to be Mitt Romney at 5%.

Ironically, despite having been the mayor of the largest city in the United States, New York, Giuliani fares best in the more rural and small town area of the state, the Central Valley.

Thompson does his best amongst conservatives and older voters. McCain does his best amongst liberals (how many of them are in the Republican party in this state?) where he ties Giuliani, and moderates where he is within the margin of error, but is way behind Giuliani and Thompson when it comes to conservatives.

Perhaps the most startling finding is that a full 30% of the young (under age 34) voters support "other" candidates than the top four in the Republican race. When coupled with the 9% who have not stated a choice at all, there may be 39% of the GOP youth vote up for grabs in the California primary.

Bush and Iraq

The President has a 25% approval rating amongst California adults and only 24% with California voters with 68% of them disapproving.

Just 19% of Californians (22% of voters) say they approve of the President’s handling of the situation in Iraq, while 71% disapprove (72% of voters). Less than half as many Californians (27% overall and 30% of voters) saying they believe what President Bush tells the American people is true, as those who say they do not believe the president (61% of adults and 62% of voters).

Bush’s status in California has plummeted so badly that his approval rating among Republicans is 45-46% and his approval on Iraq among Republicans is 41-50%. Only 53% of Republican voters say they believe the president tells the truth while 37% do not believe he speaks truthfully.

Bush's low ratings are not confined to the war. While he fares better on his handling of the economy, just 32% approve of this while 58% disapprove.

In a finding that augurs well for passage of the ballot initiative being proposed by Senate President pro Tem Don Perata, only 26% of Californians feel the Iraq War has been worth it versus 64% who do not.

About the Poll

This poll was taken between June 18 and 22 and has a margin of error of 3.1% for all adults, 3.8% for voters, and 3.9% for likely voters. Although not stated, presumably the results for the primary elections are of likely voters, although the numbers would not change all that much if it was of voters.

Posted on June 25, 2007

Comments

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

Get email updates!

Get Email Updates

Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.



© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.

RSS

Stat tracker