Advertise Here

Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.

Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.

Learn more about ads.

About Us

Frank D. Russo

The California Progress Report is published by Frank D. Russo, a longtime observer of and participant in California politics.

About Frank Russo.
About California Progress Report.

Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column? Contact Frank here.

Sponsors

Books

A UC Student's Plea to the Legislature on Fee Increases and Cuts in Academic Preparation in Governor Schwarzenegger’s Revised Budget

Bill-Shiebler.gif

By Bill Shiebler , President
University of California Student Association

Since the Governor released his budget proposal in January, students have made it loud and clear that California's families cannot take another fee increase & cuts to Academic Preparation programs. UC students statewide have sent over 12,000 postcards to the legislature, lobbied in-district and at the Capitol, and testified at budget and education committee hearings. And just last week, students faxed over 3,000 letters and made nearly 400 calls to Sacramento.

However, Governor Schwarzenegger released his revisions to the 2007-2008 California State Budget with much disappointment to California’s hard working students and families. As in the January Budget Proposal, the Governor has once again turned his back on higher education by maintaining a 7-10% increase in fees and zero funding Academic Preparation Programs.

In addition, the Governor also indicates that this pattern of back-door taxation on students and families is likely to continue until 2011, bringing the total fee increases well over 100% from where they were just a few years ago. This is frustrating and it’s outrageous. The total cost of a UC education is already expensive and increasing fees another 7-10% is just unacceptable. In 2005, the total cost of a UC education for an incoming student was $20,474. Last year it increased by $678 and this year it will increase by an additional $1028.

UCSA does not accept the claims that there is no other option but to further increase the cost burden of a public higher education onto California’s working families. With a nearly $200 million dollar surplus in unexpected tax revenue, it is clear the Governor had the opportunity to be a champion for higher education, but he chose not to. Even the state Legislative Analyst’s Office recommended only a 2.4% fee increase which would more realistically tie fee increases to rates of inflation. Thus, we are even more disappointed in the Governor’s decision to increase fees and zero fund Academic Preparation programs because he clearly had options.

Thousands of students, teachers, and families have voiced the need to stop these increases all together through a fee buyout that many legislators support. But instead, the Governor called for an increase, a tax on the middle and working class of our state. We can no longer allow Governor Schwarzenegger to pretend he is investing in the future of our state’s economy. Instead he is taking a gamble by poorly funding higher education and taxing over 200,000 students with another fee increase of almost $500 next year. With another 7-10% increase, UC students will be paying at least $7,493 in fees alone next year.

As the California budget process nears an end, UCSA will continue to pressure legislative leaders to uphold their commitment to the future of California. Many legislators have already vocally expressed their support for students but now it’s time for them, including Speaker Nunez, to take action. The Speaker and the budget conference committee are our last hope to ensure California’s students and families are provided with an accessible and affordable higher education.

In the Speaker’s response to the May Revision, he called the Governor’s budget “mean-spirited” and said that “at a time of record prosperity, it punishes low and middle-income families who are working hard and playing by the rules.” In addition to poor children, the elderly, blind and disabled, the Governor has chosen to stand by his attacks on public higher education in California, all the while pretending that he wants California to remain economically competitive.

We know the Speaker is a champion for those Californians who are constantly attacked by the Governor and California’s students and families need him to take action. We are urging Speaker Nunez to bring a proposal to the budget conference committee to prevent ANOTHER 7-10% fee increase at UC campuses and restore Academic Preparation Program funding to $33 million dollars. It is time for the legislature to address the UC access and affordability crisis and take a stand for the future of higher education.

Bill Shiebler is the president of the University of California Student Association and the UC Santa Barbara Associated Students External Vice President of Statewide Affairs. Mr. Shiebler is currently an undergraduate sociology major at UCSB.

The University of California Student Association is the official voice of over 200,000 undergraduate, graduate, and professional students from the ten UC campuses. It is our mission to advocate on behalf of current and future students for the accessibility, affordability, and quality of the University of California system.

Posted on May 18, 2007

Comments

On February 9 of 1968, the Fresno Bee reported that “The joint legislative Committee on Higher Education voted to oppose the imposition of tuition or any large increase in student fees at the University of California and the state colleges for the 1968-69 school year.” Today, Mr. Shiebler laments an increase in already sizeable tuition. What happened?
Californians either have not understood the relationship between out-of-control population growth and costs of public services, or have failed to act to restrain that growth, or both. The consequence is the present predicament of relative unaffordability of not only tuition, but of housing, health care, and other private needs and social services.
A not insurmountable task for the capable students of the University would be the analysis [a spreadsheet will suffice] of personal and social service costs as a function of population growth, taking into account limited resources such as land, water, fisheries, etc., as a basis for informing the legislature of the few choices remaining in determining the State’s future. Possibly such analyses have been made, but if so they are not easy to discover. (Some possible sources are: the Institute of Governmental Studies, University of California Berkeley, www.igs.berkeley.edu and the California Taxpayers' Association, www.caltax.org)
More likely than corrective action by the legislature will be continued addition to the population with concomitant pressure on social service costs and housing costs, increasing arguments over division of State revenues to relieve those pressures, and the continued descent of California into a society of the wealthy and the poor.

Posted by: Erik Kengaard at May 20, 2007 08:42 AM

Of course, there are other factors, but they are amplified by population density. One such factor would be the enormous sums poured into the housing market by monetization of rewards of the dot com boom and decline. Ditto re the entertainment industry. Seems as though almost everyone is just watching, few if any are understanding, and none are taking effective action.
Oh well - Go Bears!

Posted by: Erik Kengaard at May 20, 2007 07:32 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

Get email updates!

Get Email Updates

Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.



© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.

RSS

Stat tracker