Advertise Here

Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.

Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.

Learn more about ads.

About Us

Frank D. Russo

The California Progress Report is published by Frank D. Russo, a longtime observer of and participant in California politics.

About Frank Russo.
About California Progress Report.

Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column? Contact Frank here.

Sponsors

Books

Teamsters & Turtles Target Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, Wages & Pollution

opendna_bio.gif

By Jay McKinnon
LongBeachPolitics.org


During the Seattle WTO protests, in 1999, the phrase "Turtles & Teamsters, Together At Last" jumped from protest sign to guiding philosophy. It symbolically described hundreds of thousands Sierra Club activists (who dressed as sea turtles) and union members who marched to demand that human and environmental concerns be included in discussions of global Free Trade regimes. "Turtles & Teamsters" also put a name to the increasingly common alliances between environmentalists and labor unions, which were no longer willing to accept that protecting the environment and jobs were mutually exclusive conditions. That potent alliance has formed around the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, and offers both hope and dangers.

In August 2006 Teamster reps told me the Brotherhood "basically got kicked out of the ports when the trucking industry was deregulated and hiring owner-operators became the standard MO for the industry. The Teamsters ominously said that they were already laying to ground work to reorganize drayage drivers and 'we'll be back'." (LBP 10/19/2006) The following October, Governor Schwarzenegger vetoed a bill that would have granted collective bargaining rights to drayage drivers, for the second year in a row. (ibid)

The March 29th edition of the Daily Breeze showed a mob of owner-operators at a Coalition for Clean and Safe Ports rally. Careful observers noted that each of the enthusiastic port truck drivers wore a green fleece with a Teamsters' emblem on the breast, but that not one of them was legally allowed to join the union.

It's the irony in that picture that foreshadows an explosive political conflict in the coming months and years. The CCSP has proposed that the Ports limit access to pre-approved companies and their employees, a local-level policy change which would make an end-run around Sacramento. The change would radically alter the labor relations by ending the 'independent contracting', provide a mechanism for enforcing vehicle efficiency upgrades and shore up TSA security initiatives. It would also inevitably (and substantially) raise the cost of moving freight, which means the world's largest retailers and manufacturers will not be gentle.

In the short term, shippers will probably be able to keep the Ports from implementing the CCSP's proposals, but it comes with a risk. Teamsters are famous for their militancy and port truckers have been known to stage their own independent direct actions (i.e. shutting down the I-5 with a single abandoned truck). This is the beginning of an election cycle which many expect to obliterate the Republican Party, and an energized Democratic Party is looking at every conceivable cause to grow and activate its base. Allowing tens of thousands of immigrant truck drivers to unionize will be an easy issue support for Democratic insurgents, and an easy campaign promise to deliver once in power.

Toeing the line and refusing to negotiate has been a reliable breakwater for businesses and shippers keep down costs. Logistics industry insiders, however, predict a 'Perfect Storm' in 2008 and truckers in Long Beach may contribute to the tsunami which threatens to wipe out the deregulated transportation industry of the last 20 years.

To read more, see For cleaner US ports, cut truck fumes first? , by the Christian Science Monitor, Cleaning Up Trucks at California Ports Clears the Air and Improves Truckers' Lives by the California Progress Report, and Teamsters: California ports exploit truckers, by eTrucker.com

Jay McKinnon is blogger-in-chief at LongBeachPolitics.org and has published under the nom de web opendna since 1997.

Posted on April 10, 2007

Comments

this is crap, instead of dressed up like u say turtles, they have non drivers dressed up to look like drivers. they have claimed that owner operators are behind this movement which is totally un true. u really think we want to give our right to truck ownership up to go back to driving company trucks? we wanted help from the union to raise the rates so we could better maintain what we have or purchase newer trucks, not give them up and we would have joined the union in return. they have a hand full of drivers that support this because those drivers either don't own a truck or have a truck that is in such bad shape they just want to give it up and drive a company truck, but no owner operator who has worked hard in this business for year to pay for what we have wants to give up the right in america to ownership of a small business. better investigate actually how many so-called owner operators are really owner operators and not standins at these rallys!

Posted by: robert kane at August 3, 2008 07:37 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

Get email updates!

Get Email Updates

Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.



© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.

RSS

Stat tracker