- HOME
- About
- Topics
- Angelides
- Arnold Schwarzenegger
- California Attorney General Race
- California Congressional Races
- California Democratic Party
- California Governor Race 2010
- California Legislative Races
- California Lt. Governor Race
- California Secretary of State Race
- California State Budget
- California State Controller
- Campaign Finance Reform
- Campaigns
- Cell Phones
- Children and Families
- Consumer Rights
- Corporate Accountability
- Criminal Justice
- Death With Dignity
- Disaster Preparation
- Discrimination and Civil Rights
- Economy/ Economic Crisis
- Education
- Elections and Voting
- Electoral College
- Energy
- Environment
- Farm Animal Cruelty Ballot Measure
- Flood Control
- Food Safety
- Gas Prices
- Governor's Election Race
- Gun control
- Health Care
- Health Insurance
- Hiram Johnson's Corner
- Housing
- Human Rights
- Humor
- Immigration
- Infrastructure
- Initiative Reform
- Insurance Commissioner Race
- Labor
- Language and Politics
- Legal System
- Media and Communication
- Minimum Wage
- Open Government
- Pharmaceutical Companies
- Politics
- Preschool
- Presidential Election 2008
- Prevention of Farm Animal Cruelty Act Prop
- Prison Reform
- Privacy
- Privitization
- Prop 11-Redistricting/Reapportionment
- Prop 12--Veterans Housing Bond
- Prop 1A--High Speed Rail
- Prop 2--Treatment of Farm Animals
- Prop 3-Children's Hospital Bonds
- Prop 4 Waiting Period and Parental Notification
- Prop 5--Non-violent drug offenses
- Prop 6--Police and law enforcement spending
- Prop 7 and 10-Alternative Fuel and Energy Bond
- Prop 8 and-Marriage Equality
- Prop 85 Parental Notification
- Prop 86 Tobacco Tax
- Prop 87--Alternative Energy
- Prop 9 Parole
- Prop 90
- Prop 91--Transportation Funding
- Prop 92- Community Colleges
- Prop 93--Term Limits
- Props 94-97--Tribal Gaming
- Props 98 and 99
- Racial Disparities
- Responsible Lending
- Retirement Benefits
- Site of the Day
- Solar Initiative
- Structure of California Government
- Taxes
- Toxic Chemicals
- Transportation/Transit
- Water
- Westly
- Workers' Compensation
- Stories
- Proposition 1B: Restoration of Education Funding – NO
- Cavala: Jack D. Maltester – Exemplar of Public Life
- Cal-Cobra Premium Assistance Passes Senate Floor With Bipartisan Support
- Senate Approves Sen. Romero’s Bill Increasing Transparency in Education Policy
- Proposition 1A: State Budget Stabilization – YES
- Local School District Receive Solar Grant
- $634 Million Coming To California For Special Education
- Essay Seven: Props 1D, 1E and 1F
- Running the Show with Wonks and Gurus
- California Needs Propositions 1a-1f to Protect Schools, Health Care And Public Safety From Devastating Cuts And Layoffs
- 33rd California Peace Officers Memorial Ceremony: With Duty and Honor
- Essay Six: Props 1A, 1B and 1C
- Directory
- Donate
- Contact Us
RSS Advertise Here
Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.
Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.
Our latest headlines
- The Black-White Fallacy of Public Option
- Targeting Obesity Remains A Priority in Tough Budget Times
- Thousands Speak Out Against CA’s Costly and Broken Death Penalty
- Cuts Would Jeopardize Well-Being of Many Disabled Citizens
- Fully Fund Our Schools
- Same Governor, Different Goals
- Assemblymember Evans Sets the Record Straight
About Us
David Greenwald, Editor. (Contact David.)
CFC Education Foundation, Publisher. (Contact us.)
Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column?
Contact David here.
About California Progress Report.
Founded by Frank D. Russo (Publisher and Editor, 2006-08).
Sponsors
Books
It's Now Up to UC Board of Regents to Examine the BP Deal in Detail
By John M. Simpson
the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights (FTCR)
Meeting in a special session, UC Berkeley’s faculty senate struggled with parliamentary procedures to reject resolutions that would have asked Chancellor Robert Birgeneau to delay signing a $500 million deal with oil giant BP to create an alternate energy research institute.
With the faculty's failure to stand up, the UC Board of Regents needs to prevent Cal Berkeley from becoming Big Oil U.'s next campus, UCBP.
An article by Richard Paddock in the Los Angeles Times lays out what's at stake. He writes:
"A $500-million deal between UC Berkeley and oil giant BP to establish a joint energy laboratory has prompted growing protests by students and faculty who fear the arrangement will compromise the university's integrity.
"Some critics charge that the privately negotiated pact will turn the campus into 'UCBP.' And they question aspects of the deal that would give the oil company unusual influence at the campus, including exclusive control over some of the institute's expected findings."
The faculty senate meeting highlighted a split on campus between many professors from the humanities who questioned the deal's terms and the secret way it was negotiated, and faculty from the sciences. Not surprisingly, the scientists are most likley to benefit directly from BP money and other corporate funding.
More attention was on the minutia of Roberts Rules of Order than on any substantive debate of the issues and it was clear the fix was in. It was obvious from the beginning that so-called “compromise resolutions” handed out on yellow sheets of paper as the hour-and-a-half session started would carry the day.
I attended the meeting in Boalt Hall after joining Prof. Ignacio Chapela at a news conference to speak out against the deal. He was among the professors who had called for the special session. We’re not the only people asking for a delay and a full examination of the implications of the proposed deal with BP.
The Sacramento Bee editorialized:
“Chancellor Robert Birgeneau of the University of California, Berkeley, needs to delay signing a contract with the oil company BP that would create the largest academic-industry consortium in U.S. history...
“Today, the university's Academic Senate will consider a proposed resolution to delay the signing of the BP deal until the faculty has a chance to formally review it. At an open campus, the chancellor should encourage such debate, not try to stifle it.”
The faculty senate struggled with the parliamentary complexities and then, with little serious discussion of the issues, almost devoting more attention to the placement of a set of parentheses, rammed through the “compromise.”
It says:
“Be it resolved that the Academic Senate instruct the Chair of the Berkeley Division to advise the Chancellor that an adequately supported committee composed of four members of the Academic Senate (the chairs of the Budget Committee, the Committee of Research, the Committee on Academic Planning and Resource Allocation, and the Committee on Academic Freedom) be constituted to serve in an advisory capacity to the chancellor in the initiation and oversight of the Energy Biosciences Institute and similar future endeavors.”
There’s an old joke that has made the rounds of most universities: Why are academic politics so savage? It’s because the stakes are so low.
Sadly, this is one of the rare cases where the profs’ votes really mattered in the world outside the ivory tower. The majority of them let us down.
Will the UC Board of Regents exercise its authority to examine the deal in detail?
Comments
Will UC/BP partnership increase oil use and profit?
Posted by: Charlie Peters at April 21, 2007 08:02 AM
Post a comment
Commenters: You must preview your comment before posting. And please only hit "Post" once; it may take a while, but your comment is being processed. Thanks.
Get Email Updates
Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.
© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.
