- HOME
- About
- Topics
- Angelides
- Arnold Schwarzenegger
- California Attorney General Race
- California Congressional Races
- California Democratic Party
- California Legislative Races
- California Lt. Governor Race
- California Presidential Primary
- California Secretary of State Race
- California State Budget
- California State Controller
- Campaign Finance Reform
- Campaigns
- Cell Phones
- Children and Families
- Consumer Rights
- Corporate Accountability
- Criminal Justice
- Death With Dignity
- Disaster Preparation
- Discrimination and Civil Rights
- Education
- Elections and Voting
- Electoral College
- Energy
- Environment
- Flood Control
- Food Safety
- Gas Prices
- Governor's Election Race
- Gun control
- Health Care
- Health Insurance
- High Speed Rail
- Hiram Johnson's Corner
- Housing
- Human Rights
- Humor
- Immigration
- Infrastructure
- Initiative Reform
- Insurance Commissioner Race
- Labor
- Language and Politics
- Legal System
- Media and Communication
- Minimum Wage
- Open Government
- Pharmaceutical Companies
- Politics
- Preschool
- Prison Reform
- Privacy
- Privitization
- Prop 85 Parental Notification
- Prop 86 Tobacco Tax
- Prop 87--Alternative Energy
- Prop 90
- Prop 91--Transportation Funding
- Prop 92- Community Colleges
- Prop 93--Term Limits
- Props 94-97--Tribal Gaming
- Props 98 and 99
- Racial Disparities
- Redistricting/Reapportionment
- Responsible Lending
- Retirement Benefits for Public Employees
- Site of the Day
- Structure of California Government
- Taxes
- Toxic Chemicals
- Transportation/Transit
- Water
- Westly
- Workers' Compensation
- Stories
- REMEMBERING MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR.-- April 4th Marks 40 Years Since His Assassination
- The Need for Redistricting Reform from This California Democrat’s Perspective
- The Grim Statistics of Californians Dying for Lack of Health Care Coverage
- Slash and Burn: Proposed Federal Budget Would Cut Environmental Programs Under Fire by Schwarzenegger Administration
- California College Students Plan Day of Action on Budget Cuts
- Spring Break, CALPIRG Style
- “Understanding California's School Funding Crisis: Why it's happening, what it means, and how it can be resolved” is our site of the day
- Hard Hitting Ads Against Denham in California Senate Recall Election Begin Running and Ask: “Don’t We Deserve Better?”
- G.O.P. Assembly Leader Proposes To Save California Public Education Cuts Without New Taxes--By Shifting School Money From Democratic To Republican School Districts
- Oceans Day 2008: Meeting with California Legislators on Issues So Important to Our Coastal State
- Dan Walters Needs Our Help on High Speed Rail in California
- California Sues Bush EPA to Comply With Year Old Supreme Court Ruling on Regulating Greenhouse Gases
- Directory
- Donate
- Contact Us
RSS Advertise Here
Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.
Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.
Our latest headlines
- Cavala: Rich-Guy Governor Demonstrates Insensitivity to Salaried Employees of California’s Government
- Political Robo Calls Are Illegal in California: You Can Help Enforce the Law and Protect Your Privacy
- I'd Buy That for $10 - Access To California State Parks
- Cal in the Capitol Gives Students a Bird’s Eye View of State Politics and Public Policy
- 11 Things I've Learned Running Over 100 Bond and Tax Measure Campaigns in California
- A McCain Meltdown?
- Cavala: Field Poll Suggests G.O.P. “Comeuppance” This November in California
About Us
The California Progress Report is published by Frank D. Russo, a longtime observer of and participant in California politics.
About Frank Russo.
About California Progress Report.
Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column? Contact Frank here.
Sponsors
It's Now Up to UC Board of Regents to Examine the BP Deal in Detail
By John M. Simpson
the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights (FTCR)
Meeting in a special session, UC Berkeley’s faculty senate struggled with parliamentary procedures to reject resolutions that would have asked Chancellor Robert Birgeneau to delay signing a $500 million deal with oil giant BP to create an alternate energy research institute.
With the faculty's failure to stand up, the UC Board of Regents needs to prevent Cal Berkeley from becoming Big Oil U.'s next campus, UCBP.
An article by Richard Paddock in the Los Angeles Times lays out what's at stake. He writes:
"A $500-million deal between UC Berkeley and oil giant BP to establish a joint energy laboratory has prompted growing protests by students and faculty who fear the arrangement will compromise the university's integrity.
"Some critics charge that the privately negotiated pact will turn the campus into 'UCBP.' And they question aspects of the deal that would give the oil company unusual influence at the campus, including exclusive control over some of the institute's expected findings."
The faculty senate meeting highlighted a split on campus between many professors from the humanities who questioned the deal's terms and the secret way it was negotiated, and faculty from the sciences. Not surprisingly, the scientists are most likley to benefit directly from BP money and other corporate funding.
More attention was on the minutia of Roberts Rules of Order than on any substantive debate of the issues and it was clear the fix was in. It was obvious from the beginning that so-called “compromise resolutions” handed out on yellow sheets of paper as the hour-and-a-half session started would carry the day.
I attended the meeting in Boalt Hall after joining Prof. Ignacio Chapela at a news conference to speak out against the deal. He was among the professors who had called for the special session. We’re not the only people asking for a delay and a full examination of the implications of the proposed deal with BP.
The Sacramento Bee editorialized:
“Chancellor Robert Birgeneau of the University of California, Berkeley, needs to delay signing a contract with the oil company BP that would create the largest academic-industry consortium in U.S. history...
“Today, the university's Academic Senate will consider a proposed resolution to delay the signing of the BP deal until the faculty has a chance to formally review it. At an open campus, the chancellor should encourage such debate, not try to stifle it.”
The faculty senate struggled with the parliamentary complexities and then, with little serious discussion of the issues, almost devoting more attention to the placement of a set of parentheses, rammed through the “compromise.”
It says:
“Be it resolved that the Academic Senate instruct the Chair of the Berkeley Division to advise the Chancellor that an adequately supported committee composed of four members of the Academic Senate (the chairs of the Budget Committee, the Committee of Research, the Committee on Academic Planning and Resource Allocation, and the Committee on Academic Freedom) be constituted to serve in an advisory capacity to the chancellor in the initiation and oversight of the Energy Biosciences Institute and similar future endeavors.”
There’s an old joke that has made the rounds of most universities: Why are academic politics so savage? It’s because the stakes are so low.
Sadly, this is one of the rare cases where the profs’ votes really mattered in the world outside the ivory tower. The majority of them let us down.
Will the UC Board of Regents exercise its authority to examine the deal in detail?
Comments
Will UC/BP partnership increase oil use and profit?
Posted by: Charlie Peters at April 21, 2007 08:02 AM
Post a comment
Get Email Updates
Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.
© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.
