Advertise Here
Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.
Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.
Our latest headlines
- Obama’s Pick of Panetta for CIA Director Draws Array of Responses
- Is Budget Plan by Democrats in Legal Jeopardy?
- Great Priests Have Helped Me Immeasurably Throughout My Life
- The Holidays Are Over, Now When Are We Going to Get Serious?
- Cavala: Should the Legislature Be Tanked Because 15% Of Their Staff Obtain Raises And Others Get “Plumb Jobs” as Lobbyists?
- California in Desperate Need of a Stimulus Package
- California is in Desperate Need of a Gas Tax
About Us
The California Progress Report is published by Frank D. Russo, a longtime observer of and participant in California politics.
About Frank Russo.
About California Progress Report.
Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column? Contact Frank here.
Sponsors
Books
Hillary Clinton Shows Depth at California Democratic Convention
Solid Speech, Savvy Press Conference, Seasoned Campaign Organization, and a Lot More Going on in Private Meetings Behind Closed Doors

Clinton at a packed news conference with Fabian Nunez and 15 Members of the California Assembly who have endorsed her
By Frank D. Russo
Speaking in a raspy voice before over 3,000 delegates and observers, and a press corp of over 300, Hillary Clinton delivered a thirty minute speech that had many standing on their feet both during the speech and at its end. She then segued into a press conference where she was introduced by Speaker of the Assembly Fabian Nunez with 14 other members of the California State Assembly who have endorsed her and were standing behind her, emphasizing her insider connections and support from elected officials.
There are, to be sure, many in attendance at the California Democratic Party Convention here in San Diego, who prefer other candidates, make no mistake about that. Many, if not most, consider Clinton to be the “establishment candidate,” something curious given the fact that if nominated she would be the first woman to run for President as the standard bearer of a major party.
She was asked about this at a packed press conference by a reporter who characterized the split on the convention floor as some delegates in their heads being for Clinton and in their hearts supporting Barack Obama. She said that “We have great candidates running,” and that she was excited to be campaigning and talking about the issues.
The San Francisco Chronicle article in this morning’s paper, summed up the situation in a nutshell with the following paragraph which I think hit the nail on the head:
Clinton's eloquent speech impressed the convention, but Obama, the Illinois senator, sent shockwaves of excitement rippling through the hall filled with delegates and volunteers waving "Obama" placards.
Clinton also had many campaign signs evident during her speech and her campaign was decidedly more professional and disciplined than Obama’s which was more grassroots like. Obama had lots of supporters on the streets of San Diego.
Parsing through both her speech and that of Obama, it is hard to find major differences on issues and policies, and most delegates were hard pressed to articulate the differences, except on the perhaps on the war in Iraq, where both candidates favor withdrawal and have voted for withdrawal of troops. When it comes to the issues of health care, education, the environment, there is broad general agreement.
Both addressed Iraq and resonated well with the convention, although some still harbor feelings that Clinton should have apologized for her initial support of the war. California Democratic Party spokesperson Bob Mulholland who is strictly neutral in this race and has nice things to say about all Presidential candidates said after her speech that “She spoke to the people of California and the delegates very effectively. Like others, she spoke about Iraq which is very important.”
At the press conference, I was able to ask her whether she would support the ballot proposition proposed by Senator Don Perata which calls on President Bush to immediately and safely withdraw all troops from Iraq. She gave a lengthy answer that detailed the many votes she has cast in support of ending the war, and the triggering dates in July and October in those measures, but did not address the proposition that may be on the February 5, 2008 Presidential primary ballot. She knows how to stay on message.
I was very impressed with Clinton’s answer to a question about the money raising that all of the candidates have to focus on. She said that she has always been a strong supporter of public financing of campaigns and said “I will see if there is any way under our Constitution” that this can be done. She cited Supreme Court decisions equating money in campaigns with free speech and said if effective action cannot be taken to curb abuses that a constitutional amendment may be necessary.
Nunez, who introduced her to the press assemblage, and who is now a national cochair of the Clinton campaign, referenced his roots “as a kid a few blocks away from where we are today in Logan Heights” an impoverished neighborhood of San Diego. He asked “Who would have thought that I would be introducing the next President of the United States?” He lauded Clinton for her position on global warming laws, child foster care, health care, and other issues California is dealing with, showing that she will be well briefed on what is on the minds of the voters of our state. Clinton showed depth here as she complemented Californians on our efficient use and low consumption per capita of energy.
A funny moment occurred when Clinton was asked whether we would be getting a “two-for-one” deal with her Bill Clinton in the package. Nunez said from his position next to Clinton “woman in the driver’s seat” and without missing a beat Clinton said “and who would be asking for directions?” She said “I’d give my advice to my husband when he was President. Sometimes he’d follow my advice and sometimes he didn’t,” indicating that this would be her pattern as President.
Following the public events, Clinton met with Democratic National Committee (DNC) members and delegates in private meetings, with her eye on the prize. All in all, very disciplined, on message, and with a professional campaign apparatus that leaves no stone unturned. If nominated, she will have strong help from these convention goers including those who are supporting other candidates.
Yesterday, there were no less than 21 speeches to the convention attendees, including other Dennis Kucinich and Chris Dodd who are Presidential candidates. Today we hear from Senator Edwards and Governor Bill Richardson. In the early afternoon, unless the convention runs over, those with strong endurance, many of whom care strongly about the official positions of the California Democratic Party will debate and vote on a dozen or so resolutions and the hall will empty.
Attending these conventions, one is in a cocoon of sorts. While you get in person information, direct contact with candidates, their campaign staffs, and a mass of Democratic humanity, it is difficult to keep up with the outside news and to gain perspective. It is also grueling to attend multiple events, process all the information, and write somewhat cogently.
With a full tape recorder of interviews, speeches, and statements, paper handed to me, and a bit of thought, I will have more to report later today and during the week.
You can watch the convention online. For the live webcast, click here.
Comments
I gave money to the Bill Richardson campaign mainly because he doesn't ask for more than $1.00 unless you wish to give more. See www.richardsonforpresident.com . Some other Democratic candidates wanted $5.00 or $10.00 as the lowest contribution you could donate using a credit card. This early in the race, spending more than $1.00 can be bad for business, because 7 of the 8 possible candidates will not get the party nomination so I don't want to put all my eggs in one basket until all the candidates odds improve dramatically. Like most people, I like to bet on winners.
Posted by: Gone Fishing at April 29, 2007 10:25 AM
I would like to say this I voted for President Bill Clinton and now I am regreting that. I did not know that the NAFTA agreement that they sign in gave away jobs for Americans. Also, it is a slap in whites and espeically blacks to know that Hillary will support immigration when blacks have suffer for years and we did not get a free pass to america. We got death. Now it is ok for Mexican to come to american and get food stamps, they kids can go to school, they get medicad. It hurting and I will be a d-- fool to vote a person like this in that given another minority a way in when my people suffer to get where we are today and still suffering. Look at Barack Obama if he was a white candiate and got people following him like he do know one will care about experience, know one would worry about what church he attend, know one will care were his roots started from. This suppose to be a democracy countrie, we have military young and old dying for democracy for another countrie when high interest, and lobbyist and righ wing religious group stear our country.
We had a Bush, a Clinton, a Bush, now we might have Clinton again or you telling me know other family can run this countrie. I know Republican hate they back a President that cared more about his father then the people. Who went into a war and took his eye off the real terroist.
Let me also say this how did he kept us safe. These people that did the 9/11 was train by american people, who had green card or whatever legal information they had same way we doing for mexican who or killing blacks in LA. Do not get me wrong I do not mind about immigrants but be legal. Do not have me support immigrants and I can not hardly feed myself.
GO OBAMA IF KNOW ONE BACK YOU BECAUSE AS A BLACK MAN YOU SHOWING ME THAT AMERICAN CAN SUPPORT A BLACK MAN.........
Posted by: Lovell at January 12, 2008 04:20 AM
Post a comment
Get Email Updates
Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.
© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.
RSS 