Advertise Here

Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.

Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.

Learn more about ads.

About Us

David Greenwald, Editor. (Contact David.)
CFC Education Foundation, Publisher. (Contact us.)

Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column?
Contact David here.

About California Progress Report.

Founded by Frank D. Russo (Publisher and Editor, 2006-08).

Sponsors

Books

Is a California Prison Reform Deal Imminent?

frankrusso-small.jpg

By Frank D. Russo

I attended a program earlier today, "Exporting California: California's Influence in 2008 and Beyond", hosted by the Public Policy Institute of California, the James Irvine Foundation and the New America Foundation. The main fare centered around our state's influence on the 2008 Presidential election and also on "Making Policy in the 'Nation-State' of California. There will be some articles on that tomorrow.

But what caught my attention were some comments by Michael Villines, the Republican leader in the Assembly and Governor Schwarzenegger on prison reform and their suggestion that a deal is imminent.

Villines' comments came first during a freewheeling panel where there was a fair amount of bonhomie and visions dancing in his head and that of Speaker Nunez of bipartisan cooperation. They had both just landed back from Washington, D.C. where they and a number of their colleagues had met with members of the California Congressional delegation and other Senators and Members of Congress.

In the middle of a long statement about working on a number of issues, he said this:

"We're going to work together for Californians first. That is what Republicans want. There is no doubt about it, you know that's what the Democrats want. So now we have to do it. We have to be adult and we have to show up. We've got a prison issue that we're going to have to resolve. I believe we can do that. The broad pieces of a deal are there and it's time to go forward."

40 minutes later, also in the middle of many thoughts, this cropped up in what he was saying:

"I believe that we're setting a trend for the country in working together. I believe our respective parties demand us to our core principles that we won't waiver on, but then you enter into these talks and solve problems, and I think you're going to see that on prisons soon."

So, as the panel broke and we were going over to have lunch with the Governor (and a couple of hundred folks), I asked him about this and he told me he indeed thought there would be progress on the prisons soon.

At lunch, the Governor was talking about health care and the different proposals. He said:

"So right now, what I think is every one is trying to get all the stakeholders together. We have met with union leaders…So, it's all part of the song and dance and the kabuki that's going on right now, you know they do the little things they always do and then all of a sudden it goes very quickly when they all get together. I think, I have great hopes that we will have prison reform within the next week and a half or so--two weeks. I think then after that when they come back from the spring break, we're going to go and really tackle this problem of health care. I see great signs that both Democrats and Republicans want to get this done."

Later on, he was asked by Mark Baldassare of the PPIC: "As you look at this year, other than health care what are the things that the governor and the Legislature can accomplish on behalf of Californians this year?"

"Well, I think that one of the two things which is extremely important and they have been a problem for decades is prison reform and its healthcare. Those are the two most important things and then, of course, there's creating accountability in education. But those two things are really the first and most important thing. And you don't want to put too many big issues on the table because then they can't handle it."

He seemed to be placing the prisons first for solution and then health care. But why all this optimism about the prisons?

Checking back under the Capitol Dome, it seems unlikely that we will reach nirvana that soon. The legislature recesses next Thursday and they will all be out of town until april 9. Richard Stapler, spokesperson for Speaker Nunez told me. "We're continuing to meet with the Administration and other caucuses in both houses on these issues." A similar response was had from Senate President pro Tem Perata's office.

The pieces I put together are that there is intense pressure to come up with a short term solution and a bond measure to be placed on that convenient February 5, 2008 election. The deadline to do something--and to show real progress--is probably in May with the Federal Court's repeated threat to take over the prison system and reports to be issued by various receivers and special masters followed by court hearings in June.

The short term will not include out of state transfers or private facilities. There may be some facilities to move prisoners into. One proposal floating around is to have tents used!

Beyond that, to keep the Feds at bay, it will take a combination of construction of new facilities, early release, beefing up of parole, and other changes that are more long term for Judge Henderson, who has the main case in all of this, to give the state additional time.

Everyone knows this and that it takes a two-thirds vote to place bonds on the ballot. So there's pressure to strike a deal somewhere between the Governor's idea of a $10 billion or so plan to build new prisons and sentencing reform. There's a big gap between many of the Democrats and Republicans.

The money has to come from somewhere, and even with the use of bonds, it will compete with other spending in future years.

The Governor appears to be a bit optimistic. Time will tell.

Posted on March 22, 2007

Comments

Prison Federal Receiver, good idea, or money grab?

Does the Federal Government need money? What a way to grab it from the State.
We better change our sentencing laws.

The State of California Prison System is the largest of any State in the U.S. It also tops any foreign countries prison population. There is a big supply of $$$$$$$$$ in the California prison system.

Now the Federal Government has to pay California to house their Federal prisoners.

When the Feds. take over California Taxpayers will have to pay the Federal Government to take care of California prisoners. This will be a big shift in $$$$$$$$$ to the Federal Government Treasury. Do you think for one minute that the Government doesn't see the prison system as a major industry to produce cash?

The prison health care will be turned over to some very large HMO type of provider such as Health Care Services, Inc. who already has contracts with several other State's prisons.

All prisoner lawsuits will be shifted from State to Federal courts. Medical Mal Practice against prison doctors will be stopped.

The Federal Government will be able to house any prisoner in any State they see fit.

Under the disguise of Rehabilitation, it will allow the Federal Government to contract with private industry to put their manufacturing plants on California Prison property and broaden the horizon as to where these prisoner made products can be sold. This is a big $$$$ business it is not all about prisoner's health care. It is slave labor. it is a Government take-over of California Prison $$$$$$$$$.

Posted by: Nora Weber at March 24, 2007 09:51 AM

If the federal government takes over then all CO's will be gone and replacements will be hired - that means people with very very little training will be hired at $12 an hour - great incentive to protect the public! that is IF you can find someone who will take feces, urine and blood in the face for $12 an hour, if you can't then you have an even bigger problem than prison overcrowding.

if you are going to have strict laws and sentencing guidelines then you are going to have more prisoners, and more prisoners doing more time, you need more prisons - something has to give, either quit locking people up - or build more prisons to house them, you can't have it both ways.

Mega left liberals want 3 strike laws, but don't want to build more prisons...now you have to let them back on the streets.

Posted by: Concerned Citizen at April 19, 2007 04:08 PM

People need to stop making it such a big issue! The state should help thereselves out and release the inmates that have already served a great deal of there sentence to help eleviate the overcrowding. I mean let's face it there going to be released anyway. People are so concerned about letting out an inmate, but they will be surprised to know that many felons live in in there neighborhood or even work with them.

Posted by: Melanie at May 23, 2007 07:58 AM

Of course the prison system is a big money market for either the Feds or the State, so it doesn't matter. The State can build as many prisons as it wants, but that doesn't mean the public is any safer. Our governing principals should not just be punishment, but rehabilitation efforts. It costs $52,000 a year to keep an inmate in prison. That's more than receiving an education at a private 4-year university. Californians complain about not affording college for their kids, but they don't mind spending that much in keeping a non-violent criminal in prison or should i say a poor minority.

Posted by: blind_reaper903 at July 23, 2007 08:05 PM

CA seems to be ruled by more by testosterone and less by reason. Prisons are over crowded... women receive longer sentencing than their male counterparts. There are many women incarcerated for very long sentences for offenses that are not drug related or for violent crimes. they are no past 50 with long time left even for parole. And the "system" just keeps adding more to the already over crowded facilities. When 1,000's of these "grannies in the yard" could reenter their communities and make valuable contributions tot heir families wee being and their communities. Little is being done to facilitate any initiative to provide early releases for the "grannies" and yet they pose no threat of recidivism. As on time offenders, they deserve reentry sooner than later. yet the male dominated system denies their existence, instead treating all incarcerated women as the same. Why you ask? Why does a dog lick himself.. because he can. That is the story of the CA penal system... because they can. meanwhile, the gender gap in equity of sentencing women continues. Where is Gloria Allred? Hiding.

Posted by: Quality of mercy... lacking in CA at December 1, 2007 09:23 PM

I think that there is no purpose in prison reform it the same old thing anyways you get these so many years in jail and your mainly just there for the heck of it my question is how does it really help that you stick a person in jail and there supposed to get over their problem within in a certain amount of time it will just be the same thing over and over again they'll get out of jail and then they'll just end up going along with their killing, and anything else they have a problem with so whats the point of jails anyways thats my question?

Posted by: Unknown at April 20, 2008 11:31 AM

I think that there is no purpose in prison reform it the same old thing anyways you get these so many years in jail and your mainly just there for the heck of it my question is how does it really help that you stick a person in jail and there supposed to get over their problem within in a certain amount of time it will just be the same thing over and over again they'll get out of jail and then they'll just end up going along with their killing, and anything else they have a problem with so whats the point of jails anyways thats my question?

Posted by: Unknown at April 20, 2008 11:32 AM

Sorry, comments are temporarily disabled. We're doing a bit of server maintenance on the commenting area. We'll be back up and running shortly. Thank you for your patience.

Get email updates!

Get Email Updates

Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.



© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.

RSS

Stat tracker