Advertise Here

Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.

Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.

Learn more about ads.

About Us

Frank D. Russo

The California Progress Report is published by Frank D. Russo, a longtime observer of and participant in California politics.

About Frank Russo.
About California Progress Report.

Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column? Contact Frank here.

Sponsors

Books

California Transit Cuts Would Increase Congestion and Climate Change Problems for the State

carli-payne.jpg

By Carli Paine
Transportation Program Director
Transportation and Land Use Coalition (TALC)

Just two months after Californians voted in favor of more mass transit optionsas part of Prop 1B, the transportation bond, Governor Schwarzenegger proposed drastic cuts to public transit in his 2007-08 budget.

His proposed budget would raid more than $1.1billion from public transit, taking away more than half of state transit funding. Cuts in funding would lead to reduced service and fare increases, reduced access to jobs, education, and services, more traffic congestion, and higher greenhouse gas emissions.

Elements of the Governor’s budget:
• Cut $700 million in new capital investments
• Cut $411 in funding for transit operations, giving transit operations 70% less than this year.
• Use Prop 1B dollars to backfill redirected capital funds. This subverts the will of the voters, who wanted funding for more transit, not less.
• Permanently shift gas tax “Spillover,” currently dedicated to public transit, to highway rehabilitation projects.

California depends on public transit to reduce traffic congestion, cut pollution, and keep us moving. A recent study shows that if transit passengers were part of the general traffic flow, congestion would increase by 27%. And, as California prepares to add 13 million more people over the next 25 years, we need quality public transit to ensure mobility and enable more cars to stay off the roads.

Transportation accounts for 41% of the California’s greenhouse gas emissions. We can’t meet the aggressive goals of AB 32 without funding for quality public transit systems. The good news is that our legislators can reject these cuts, and lay the ground work for stable transit funding in the future.

On Wednesday, the Assembly Budget Subcommittee on Transportation held an informational hearing on public transit. Many individuals testified against these cuts.

Environmental, social equity, and transit groups across the state are rallying. Here is what some have said in response to the budget proposed by the Governor:

“Cutting public transit would ignore the public’s clear frustration with growing traffic congestion and our desire to invest in more transportation options to meet our travel needs.” Emily Rusch, CALPIRG Advocate.

“Losing this funding will have devastating impacts on the daily lives of working people, senior citizens and high school students who have no other transportation options. Juliet Ellis, Executive Director of Urban Habitat in Oakland.

“The Older Women's League joins the voices of those who are alarmed by the cuts in funding for public transit. How are we going to avoid the dependence on automobiles if we have no alternatives in this fast moving society? We must make public transit available and easy to use if it is to become a viable alternative for driving on freeways.” Betty Perry, Public Policy Director for the Older Women's League of California.

“The misallocation of the spillover funds is like a giant game of ‘hide the salami’ from a starving lion. The governor's team continues to spin and misdirect these funds to prop up other worthy projects that have been traditionally paid from the general fund. Despite the governor's green proclamations, his budget team actions are completely disingenuous and will result in great harm to the transit using public who depend on healthy transit alternatives to get to work, school and health care." Bart Reed, Executive Director of The Transit Coalition in Los Angeles.

Carli Paine is the Transportation Program Director for the Transportation and Land Use Coalition (TALC). Before she worked for TALC, she was an Associate City Planner and an Assistant City Planner in the Bay Area. For more information on the proposed cuts and attempts to protect these funds for public transit visit the Transportation and Land Use Coalition site or contact Carli Paine at carli@transcoalition.org.

Posted on March 30, 2007

Comments

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

Get email updates!

Get Email Updates

Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.



© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.

RSS

Stat tracker