Advertise Here
Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.
Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.
Our latest headlines
- Vallejo's Bankruptcy Highlights Need for Transparency in Government
- We Cannot Afford to Let Other States Lure Away Our Best Teachers Because of Budget Shortsightedness
- California Proposition 98 Will Abolish Rent Control and Have Major Impact on Accessible and Affordable Housing for People with Disabilities, Seniors & Low Income Workers
- California State Water Agency Disguises Massive New Diversions in Peripheral Canal Analysis: 1982 Deja vu All Over Again
- California Super Delegate Crystal Strait Declares for Obama: Why This is Significant
- Celebrating Mother’s Day: Help Working Moms Pass California Paid Sick Days Law
- Tony Quinn’s Analysis Makes It Clear There is No Good Reason for Democrats to Support “Reform” of Redistricting Process
About Us
The California Progress Report is published by Frank D. Russo, a longtime observer of and participant in California politics.
About Frank Russo.
About California Progress Report.
Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column? Contact Frank here.
Sponsors
Why Newsom's Wi-Fi Deal Should Be Rejected and What Other California Cities Can Learn From San Francisco's Experience

By Bob Brigham
Tomorrow, the San Francisco Board of Supervisor's hearing will examine the feasibility of San Francisco creating a Citywide Municipal Wi-Fi and broadband network and weighing the costs and benefits.
This is in stark contrast to the pending corporate deal that Mayor Gavin Newsom's administration negotiated with Google and Earthlink. With many other local governments exploring the policy ramifications of such proposals, I believe that the San Francisco experience is the perfect case study -- of what not to do.
I hesitated to enter this debate because it has become poisoned by those seeking to railroad the Google/Earthlink deal. Mayor Newsom told the San Francisco Chronicle Editorial Board that his "deal" was so important that it could not rejected. A few days later the paper editorialized, "Do you want to complain, or do you want to do something positive?" But this "my way or the high way" positioning belies numerous problems with the deal and illustrates the pitfalls that should be avoiding by other cities realizing the necessity of creating successful internet infrastructures.
In the case of the San Francisco boondoggle, the first major policy blunder was how the City failed to concurrently pursue a municipal solution. With everyone knowing that the Mayor wanted something up and running before his re-election, San Francisco was at the mercy of the corporations. This is reflected in the "deal" negotiated, which locks San Francisco into an outdated, ineffective, unreliable, and inequitable system. The old business saying is true for any municipality pursuing public/private partnerships, "if you can't afford to walk away from the table, you can't afford to negotiate."
The second problem was the fact that the Newsom administration had decided upon the methodology they wanted without studying whether it was the best way to achieve their goals. As a technology consultant, I see this problem often with decision makers saying what they want to do instead of what they want to accomplish and more often than not their ideas are not the best means to their ends. In San Francisco's case, this was the insistence upon a free, privately-funded Wi-Fi network. The problem is that this won't achieve the goals of a fast, secure, reliable, and inclusive system. As most expects will explain, to explore Wi-Fi absent a fiber-optic component will not allow the City the system San Franciscans deserve and need.
However, recent events at San Francisco City Hall have provided San Francisco the opportunity to reject the corporate deal that locks San Francisco into an awful system. The most important developments are the Budget Analyst's Municipal Wi-Fi report and the fact that San Francisco is looking at a budget surplus two to four times the amount of the cost for the "Can Do City" to just do municipal Wi-Fi -- while developing the much needed fiber-optic backbone to move beyond a hub-and-spoke network.
There is precedent in San Francisco for such a move, Newsom himself used a larger amount of general fund money for his 311 phone system. If San Francisco will spend more money for what would have been the best practice for Dianne Feinstein to do when she was mayor, then San Franciscans deserve the Board of Supervisors to provide the leadership necessary for the internet communication system our City deserves in this millennium.
We need to get this right. The Google/Earthlink deal deserves to be rejected with the Board moving quickly to fund a capable municipal system.
Last July, the California Progress report to an initial look at municipal Wi-Fi best practices. Tomorrow's hearing is at the SF Board of Supervisor's Budget and Finance Committee. The meeting begins at 1PM with feasibility and municipal broadband the last two items on the agenda.
Bob Brigham is a San Francisco based consultant who specializes in online communication. He posts under the handle 'blogswarm' in his free time.
Comments
Here's a much more convincing pro-SF Wi-Fi blog post from a group that's been at the forefront this issue for years.
http://www.muniwireless.com/article/view/5627/
Newsom is far from perfect but he should be commended for his leadership on this issue. The Google/Earthlink plan is strong and the city should move ahead with it. San Francisco has an opportunity to lead the nation on technology infrastructure issues. It shouldn't pass it up.
Posted by: east bay progressive at February 7, 2007 11:26 AM
The ACLU of Northern California recently sent a letter to the SF Supervisors with an analysis detailing the privacy and free speech concerns with the final Earthlink/Google contract.
Available here. http://aclunc.org/issues/technology/asset_upload_file147_4536.pdf
Posted by: tech and civil liberties at February 10, 2007 09:39 AM
Post a comment
Get Email Updates
Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.
© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.
RSS 