Advertise Here
Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.
Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.
Our latest headlines
- California Budget Crisis: Day 69: Republican Senate Budget Proposal Expected to be Ready and Voted on Today—Majority Vote Budget Reform Gaining Support for Next Year’s Ballot
- McCain and Bush View State Issues Similarly
- Recalled Hazardous Products, Including Children’s Toys, For Sale in California—Bill On Governor’s Desk Would Keep Them Off Shelves and From Being Resold
- Cavala: Perfect ‘Storm’ Looms for the G.O.P. in California
- McCain Campaign Plays Spin the Voters (And the Press, Too)
- Same Old Litmus Tests from the Republican Ticket: Doesn’t Sound Like Change to Me
- Parity for Mental Health Treatment in California: AB 1887 Needs Governor’s Signature
About Us
The California Progress Report is published by Frank D. Russo, a longtime observer of and participant in California politics.
About Frank Russo.
About California Progress Report.
Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column? Contact Frank here.
Sponsors
"How Immigrants Affect California Employment and Wages" is our site of the day
The Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) has issued a report this week that should lay to rest the argument made by some that immigrants compete for jobs and lower the wages of U.S.-born workers. This comprehensive study, based on data between 1960 and 2004, has great significance for California policymakers as well as federal officials grappling with what should be done about immigration. In California, this issue has been identified in polls of the PPIC and the Field Survey as either the most important issue to voters or certainly in the top ones that are mentioned by them.
"How Immigrants Affect California Employment and Wages" by Giovanni Peri, an associate professor of economics at the University of California, Davis is a 18 page report that is available on line and should be read by all who care about the immigration issue.
Here are some of the findings in this report:
• There is no evidence that the inflow of immigrants over the period 1960–2004 worsened the employment opportunities of natives with similar education and experience.
• The study finds no association between the inflow of immigrants and the out-migration of natives within the same education and age group.
• Between 1990 and 2004 alone, new immigrants accounted for a 20 percent increase in the state’s total employment. Yet, rather than hurting job prospects for natives, the influx of immigrants increased the average real wages of native workers in California by 4 percent.
• The actual losers in the equation are prior immigrants, whose wages are hurt by the newcomers. In 2004, immigrants who had entered California before 1990 lost between 17 and 20 percent of their real wages due to the entry of new foreign-born workers.
This report goes beyond previous reports and rigorously analyzes data for this 44 year period. There is ample documentation for those who want to review sources and analyze the statistical methods and significance of the findings.
The PPIC is widely respected as a private, nonprofit organization dedicated to improving public policy in California through independent, objective, nonpartisan research on major economic, social, and political issues. The institute was established in 1994 with an endowment from William R. Hewlett.
Comments
The reaction to this study is simply propaganda designed to support a massive amnesty. If the study were presented as just one piece of the wider issue that would be one thing, but the way it's being presented is as the final missing piece that will finally convince the great unwashed that they should accept the amnesty that's being shoved down their throats.
In an email reprinted at my link, the author of the study admits he's not familiar with other, even more important facets of this issue, such as corruption and political influence in the U.S. for Mexico. I didn't expect him to say otherwise, but it would be nice if those who are trying to use the study would admit that there are many other more important sides to this issue.
Posted by: I get email! at February 28, 2007 09:47 PM
Did you even read the report? Propaganda is presenting something to influence the reader and/or listener. The report is actually based on facts. The rest of your comment has nothing to do with the report. If your going to criticize it, first read it and give some constructive arguments based on facts.
Posted by: MG at February 28, 2007 10:13 PM
Post a comment
Get Email Updates
Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.
© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.
RSS 