Advertise Here
Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.
Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.
Our latest headlines
- Attorney General Brown Announces Largest Predatory Lending Settlement in History: $8.68 Billion in Home Loans and Foreclosures Relief Nationally—Up to $3.5 Billion to Californians—From Countrywide Financial Corporation
- Hannah-Beth Jackson Has the Goods on Tony Strickland in Pivotal California Senate Seat Race
- Proposition 5: We Need to Fix the Drug Court System
- Turning a Red California District Blue: Is the Third Time a Charm for Ferial Masry and the Sixth Seat for Democrats to Gain Two-Thirds in the Assembly?
- The Heller Gun Decision Week 14 – The U.S. Senate Holds H.R. 6842 and California Holds SB 327
- Cavala: Competitive Legislative Seats Do Not Produce “Moderate” Lawmakers
- In California’s 5th Senate District Race Democrat Wolk Should Win
About Us
The California Progress Report is published by Frank D. Russo, a longtime observer of and participant in California politics.
About Frank Russo.
About California Progress Report.
Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column? Contact Frank here.
Sponsors
Books
A California Prison Proposal That is Disturbingly Akin to Eugenics


By Robin Levi and Vanessa Huang
Justice Now
Given California's shameful history with the forced sterilizations of thousands of people during the 20th century, you would think that bureaucrats would think twice before suggesting that the sterilization of an imprisoned woman could ever be freely chosen. And you would be wrong.
"Doing what is medically necessary" is how the Gender Responsiveness Strategies Commission of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation termed its July 18 recommendation to consider providing, in the course of delivering a baby, "elective" sterilization of women who give birth in prison, "either post-partum or coinciding with cesarean section."
To describe a sterilization performed under such circumstances as voluntary is absurd. One's ability to consent to sterilization, or anything else, during pregnancy and labor is limited in any setting, not to mention in a coercive environment such as a prison. Moreover, Robert Sillen, whom U.S. District Judge Thelton Henderson appointed last year as federal receiver over California' s prison health-care system, has documented that a person dies each day in California prisons due to gross medical neglect. How, in such an environment, could we trust prison staff to ensure informed consent to such a procedure?
Though the sterilization program has not officially commenced, our work with people in California's women's prisons indicate that prisons themselves already act as agents of reproductive oppression. Last year, one young Latina woman told us that a prison doctor tried to convince her to be sterilized right after she gave birth.
And we are already hearing of coerced and unnecessarily invasive procedures to remove the reproductive organs of prisoners occurring under the cloak of medical necessity.
Given the over-representation of people of color in U.S. prisons, the GRSC's proposed sterilizations smack of the state's long embrace of eugenics, the pseudoscience that resulted in the forced sterilizations of people in state hospitals, ostensibly for mental or developmental illness, including "female promiscuity," according to William Keating, a doctor who practiced at Sonoma State Hospital in the 1950s.
Because the state has yet to thoroughly examine its own longtime enthusiasm for eugenics practices, it's difficult to know how many of the estimated 20,000 Californians forcibly sterilized by the state in the 20th century were people of color, but it's a good bet that many were. What we do know is that, upon embarking on their own eugenics program, the Nazis were inspired by California's model.
"Elective" sterilization is not the first problematic proposal coming out of the GRSC.
Last year, a policy proposal put forward by the GRSC used misleadingly family-friendly language to dress up a prison expansion scheme as a "community-based" "alternative- to- incarceration" plan that would better serve the families of imprisoned people. This proposal for a whole new system of mini-prisons for women failed after Assemblywoman Jackie Goldberg, the proposal's principal coauthor, removed her name from it and declared it to be "a fraud." That hasn't stopped Assemblywoman Sally Lieber from reintroducing the proposal this year.
It is crucial that our elected representatives don't fall for this dangerous policy proposal and that such efforts are not given consideration in four other states to which GRSC members announced their intention to export this California mini-prison expansion model.
No legislators or policy advocates who care about low-income women and women of color, racial justice, or reproductive rights can continue to support the GRSC in good faith. California policymakers should demand the termination of all state employees present at the meeting at which this recommendation to investigate sterilization was made, and dismantle the GRSC altogether. Accountability to women's healthcare, reproductive freedom and racial justice demands such action.
To truly respond to the needs of people in women's prisons, we need to end the use of imprisonment as a de facto response to social problems.
Legislators in California and beyond should know better than to consider returning to our shameful eugenicist past, and must stand up for what voters all know is right: communities where everyone is worth caring for. We need to radically reduce the number of people in prison, beginning with a moratorium on new prison construction and staffing. We can then take funds saved from building a new system to imprison women and redirect them into much-needed social services at the county level, independent of the prison system, including housing, health care, education, and job training. Only then can we have true gender justice.
Robin Levi is the human rights director for Justice Now, an Oakland-based human rights organization. Vanessa Huang is Justice Now's campaign and media director.
Copyright 2007 Daily Journal Corp. Reprinted with permission. This file cannot be downloaded from this page. The Daily Journal’s definition of reprint and posting permission does not include the downloading, copying by third parties or any other type of transmission of any posted articles.
Comments
The Gender Responsiveness Strategies Commission has been a horrible joke since the day the concept was written on paper. It's all about dressing up what their goals are with catch phrases. Stand by, if you have issues with this, you'll be upset over some of their other recommendations. And the legislature would call CDCR on the issue.
Posted by: Joe at January 15, 2007 08:31 AM
excellent article! really, spot-on! i have posted your article and some of my analysis over at my blog (kameelahwrites.blogspot.com) as well as over at blacklooks (www.blacklooks.org)-an african fem blog. i did research on human sterilization about a year ago and went through all of the human betterment society's accessible files at an archive in pasadena. my findings were disturbing to say the least. prior to that i came across crack (Children Requiring A Caring Kommunity) which pays drug addicted women to be sterilized. this blew me away, then i was reminded not ti be the least bit surprised by these efforts, but still remain enraged enough to continue to organize.
Posted by: kameelah at January 15, 2007 10:43 PM
Dear God! Did I miss a memo in which we were advised of the repeal of the Equal Protection clause of the US Constitution?
The idea of tubal ligation being performed in a prison clinic is, in and of itself, chilling, given the appalling track record of California's prison health care.
To imply that incarcerated women can have a free choice in such a matter is a disgusting joke... and anyone who believes that white, middle class women will be "offered this option" (please note dripping sarcasm) with the same frequency as lower incom women of colour is fooling themselves.
Posted by: Delia at January 16, 2007 07:04 AM
I spent 8 months in a California jail ( 4 months twice ) for the "crime" of rescuing my only child from institutionalized abuse by the State. He was only 6 years old when illegally kidnapped from me because I refused his kindergarten teacher's request to put him on Ritalin. (which now has been issued a blackbox warning by the FDA)
There was a disproportionate number of very pregnant women (over 7 months pregnant) incarcerated by the County. Many of these women did not speak English, and virtually all were poor. If the women gave birth in jail, their babies were immediately seized by CPS. Most of these women were not afforded a hearing before this happened. In other words, most of them were probably innocent when arrested, but the way the system is set up, an evidentiary hearing may not be granted until 60 days after arrest. My questions are: Why did the County arrest these women who were in their late-term pregnancies? What happens to the babies? Are they condemned to a life of abuse in State institutions? Are these babies murdered?
Women must seriously re-think the concept of "CHOICE". An abortion is not a choice and a lifetime in foster care is not any better. Until women rally around motherhood instead of selfish pursuits, countless women and children will suffer. The new "feminism" MUST be honouring motherhood and childhood, not the path to death and destruction. The disrespect of motherhood and childhood leads to depression, suicide, homelessness, drug addiction and death. Sterilizing women is the ultimate disrespect to the female species. A life without procreation is no life at all. Women take notice: You are either with US, or you are with the terrorists. Don't put your faith in political parties or ideologies.
There are too many children wrongfully separated from their mothers. The statistics are overwhelming. Where are the so-called feminists who claim to care about the plight of women? They don't care about anything except their own selfish pursuits. Why not make mothers and children your number one priority, not the issue of homosexuality.
http://www.msnusers.com/FreeVincentBooth
Posted by: Diane Booth at January 16, 2007 12:45 PM
Has anybody organized a response to this? I couldn't find anything on Justice Now's website. Whom should we be writing or petitioning (even those of us who aren't Californians)?
Posted by: Wendy at January 22, 2007 05:15 PM
Wendy: You might try contacting the authors thorugh the Justice Now website. That's what I would do.
Posted by: Frank D. Russo at January 22, 2007 08:19 PM
Post a comment
Get Email Updates
Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.
© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.
RSS 