- HOME
- About
- Topics
- Angelides
- Arnold Schwarzenegger
- California Attorney General Race
- California Congressional Races
- California Democratic Party
- California Governor Race 2010
- California Legislative Races
- California Lt. Governor Race
- California Secretary of State Race
- California State Budget
- California State Controller
- Campaign Finance Reform
- Campaigns
- Cell Phones
- Children and Families
- Consumer Rights
- Corporate Accountability
- Criminal Justice
- Death With Dignity
- Disaster Preparation
- Discrimination and Civil Rights
- Economy/ Economic Crisis
- Education
- Elections and Voting
- Electoral College
- Energy
- Environment
- Farm Animal Cruelty Ballot Measure
- Flood Control
- Food Safety
- Gas Prices
- Governor's Election Race
- Gun control
- Health Care
- Health Insurance
- Hiram Johnson's Corner
- Housing
- Human Rights
- Humor
- Immigration
- Infrastructure
- Initiative Reform
- Insurance Commissioner Race
- Labor
- Language and Politics
- Legal System
- Media and Communication
- Minimum Wage
- Open Government
- Pharmaceutical Companies
- Politics
- Preschool
- Presidential Election 2008
- Prevention of Farm Animal Cruelty Act Prop
- Prison Reform
- Privacy
- Privitization
- Prop 11-Redistricting/Reapportionment
- Prop 12--Veterans Housing Bond
- Prop 1A--High Speed Rail
- Prop 2--Treatment of Farm Animals
- Prop 3-Children's Hospital Bonds
- Prop 4 Waiting Period and Parental Notification
- Prop 5--Non-violent drug offenses
- Prop 6--Police and law enforcement spending
- Prop 7 and 10-Alternative Fuel and Energy Bond
- Prop 8 and-Marriage Equality
- Prop 85 Parental Notification
- Prop 86 Tobacco Tax
- Prop 87--Alternative Energy
- Prop 9 Parole
- Prop 90
- Prop 91--Transportation Funding
- Prop 92- Community Colleges
- Prop 93--Term Limits
- Props 94-97--Tribal Gaming
- Props 98 and 99
- Racial Disparities
- Responsible Lending
- Retirement Benefits
- Site of the Day
- Solar Initiative
- Structure of California Government
- Taxes
- Toxic Chemicals
- Transportation/Transit
- Water
- Westly
- Workers' Compensation
- Stories
- Governor Signs Legislation To Prevent Loss Of Healthy Families Coverage For Over 900,000 Children
- Townhall Meeting Focuses on At-Risk Babies and Toddlers
- State Park Cuts Lack Logic
- Conservation Organizations Oppose California Policy That Would Give Carbon Credits for Forest Clearcutting
- WellPoint and Its Subsidiary Have Waged Campaign to Derail Health Reform
- Article Repeats Right-Wing Myth About State Spending
- Can Obama Orate His Way Out of Another Crisis?
- Furlough Issue Comes To Head This Week at UC
- Sean Hannity Spreads Dangerous Misinformation about California Water
- Daring To Get It Right: Legislature Says 'No' To Dangerous Last Minute Water Policy Proposal
- Weekly Radio Address: Galgiani, Coto Report Progress In Bipartisan Delegation’s Meetings With Key Cabinet Officials And Congressional Leaders On Budgetary And Policy Issues Critical To California
- A Missed Opportunity: Economic Recovery Should Start With the Prisons
- Directory
- Donate
- Contact Us
RSS Advertise Here
Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.
Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.
Our latest headlines
- Weekly Radio Address: Assembly Lead Water Negotiators Huffman, Caballero Discuss this Week’s Historic Agreement to Solve California’s Water Crisis
- Feinstein Once Again Flirts With Entering the Governor’s Race
- A Good Health Care Bill Emerging from the House
- Schwarzenegger Applauds Passage of Peripheral Canal/Dams Water Package
- "Historic" Water Deal Draws Both Praise and Criticism
- Republican State Senators Vote for Administrative Chaos, Backdoor Cuts in IHSS
- Assembly Budget Committee Follow-up Informational Hearing on Implementation on IHSS Program Changes
About Us
David Greenwald, Editor. (Contact David.)
CFC Education Foundation, Publisher. (Contact us.)
Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column?
Contact David here.
About California Progress Report.
Founded by Frank D. Russo (Publisher and Editor, 2006-08).
Sponsors
Books
California Voter Turnout Was 56.2% in November--Not a Record Low and Higher Than Many Reported
By Frank D. Russo
Despite widespread reporting that voter turnout in last month's gubernatorial election here in California was at a record low, the final figures counties have reported to the Secretary of State's office show that it was substantially higher than many had thought. At 56.2%, the turnout was nowhere near the record set in 2002 when Gray Davis ran for re-election and only 50.1% of eligible voters bothered to go to the polls. It just took a long time to count the record number of absentee ballots that arrived at county registrar of voters offices on Election Day or just before then or were dropped off at polling places.
By law, counties had until December 5 to complete their official canvass of election results and until December 12 to report this information to the Secretary of State's office. The Secretary of State then has until this Saturday, December 16 to certify the results.
The county by county results available on the Secretary of State's webpage show a wide range of turnout from a low of 43.2% in Imperial County to a high of 76.9% in tiny Trinity County with only 23 precincts.
In Los Angeles, the largest county in the state and a Democratic stronghold, only 51.9% voted, but this was a 7.5% improvement over 2002, when only 44.4% of eligible Angelinos went to the polls. L.A.'s vote accounted for 22.6% of the entire statewide total. Orange County, the second largest county in terms of registration and a Republican stronghold, had even lower turnout at 50.5%. This was just a little over 1% higher than the record low year of 2002.
The highest turnout amongst the ten largest counties was in Contra Costa County (involved in the McNerney-Pombo race) at 63.4%, followed by Alameda County at 61.2% and San Francisco at 60.7%. These counties provided most statewide Democrats with large margins of victory.
More interpretation of these final numbers is needed. But the analyses so far have concluded that the failure of Republicans to vote and not suppressed Democratic participation was the biggest factor in what was a lower turnout than historical averages. It also is a bit of a break in the trends since at least 1962 of decreasing percentages of eligible voters casting a vote. Page three of the Field Poll Report released on Election Day shows the percentages decreasing in Gubernatorial elections. Field has predicted only a 51.5% turnout. The Secretary of State was closer, but also underestimated the vote at 55% in his predictions.
The Field report shows that in 1962, 78.7% of voters voted, increasing to 79.2% in 1966. As a percentage of citizens eligible to vote (including those who are not registered, there has been a similar dramatic decline to the point that last month's election saw less than 40% participating.
Comments
I think the MSM figured the turnout would be low because Arnold's landslide was a forgone conclusion. Therefore many would think that voting was a waste of time and stay home. So the MSM reported based on their belief instead of on the facts.If Arnold's election had ben close I think a lot of the reporting would have been very different.
Posted by: Rodney A Stanton at December 15, 2006 02:27 PM
Sorry, comments are temporarily disabled. We're doing a bit of server maintenance on the commenting area. We'll be back up and running shortly. Thank you for your patience.
Get Email Updates
Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.
© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.
