Advertise Here

Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.

Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.

Learn more about ads.

About Us

Frank D. Russo

The California Progress Report is published by Frank D. Russo, a longtime observer of and participant in California politics.

About Frank Russo.
About California Progress Report.

Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column? Contact Frank here.

Sponsors

Books

GOVERNOR VETOES BOWEN INITIATIVE REFORM MEASURE, SAYS LETTING VOTERS KNOW WHO IS BANKROLLING MEASURES IS “EXPENSIVE AND ONEROUS”

142-bowen.gif

From State Senator Debra Bowen

"He isn’t worried about grassroots organizations being able to qualify initiatives things for the ballot, he’s concerned the monied special interests who have taken over the process will have a tougher time getting signatures if voters know who is actually bankrolling their initiative.”

That’s how Senator Debra Bowen (D-Redondo Beach), the chairwoman of the Senate Elections, Reapportionment & Constitutional Amendments Committee, reacted to Governor Schwarzenegger’s decision to veto her SB 1598 today.

“This was a way of letting people know who they’re dealing with when they’re asked to sign an initiative petition, whether it’s a real, classic, grassroots initiative effort or someone fronting for a special interest who has a financial stake in whether the measure qualifies for the ballot and passes,” continued Bowen. “It’s really pretty simple. People deserve to know where the money’s coming from and who stands to benefit from an initiative before they sign on the bottom line.”

SB 1598 would have required petition signature gatherers to disclose the measure’s five largest contributors right on the petition and to update that list within 14 days of a change in the top five contributor list. Furthermore, it would have required an initiative petition to state whether it was being circulated by a paid signature gatherer or a volunteer.

“To argue that voters shouldn’t be told who is financing a multi-million dollar signature gathering effort because it might be ‘too expensive’ for the proponents to list the top five contributors on a piece of paper doesn’t pass the laugh test,” continued Bowen. “There’s plenty of information on who is financing an initiative once it qualifies for the ballot, but there’s virtually nothing available to help people decide whether they want to support putting a measure on the ballot in the first place.”

In vetoing the bill, the Governor wrote:

“Unfortunately, under this bill, petitions circulated by paid circulators would have to be continually updated and reprinted to reflect any changes in the top five donors backing the measure. As a result, it would be more expensive and onerous to qualify initiatives for the ballot and the ability for the smaller, grassroots-oriented organizations to participate in the process would be limited.

“As with similar measures I have vetoed in the past, this bill attacks the initiative process and makes it more difficult for the people of California to gather signatures and qualify measures for the ballot. While making the process more cumbersome and costly may be for those hostile to the initiative process, it is not for reform-minded Californians.”

“The Governor has it backwards,” concluded Bowen. “Reform-minded Californians don’t want to be kept in the dark when it comes to money and politics. They want their government to be more transparent and they want more information, not less, about where the money comes from to put initiatives on the ballot.”

SB 1598 was similar to SB 469 (Bowen) of 2005, which was also vetoed by the Governor.

Debra Bowen is the Democratic nominee for California Secretary of State. She is the Chair of the Senate Elections, Reapportionment, and Constitutional Amendments Committee.

Posted on September 29, 2006

Comments

These observations are correct. For example, has anyone noticed that Sharon Runner is running for Assembly in Lancaster? She is using a highly emotional issue such as child molestation to bring her hundreds of thousands of dollars from law enforcement labor unions. That's because Prop 83 is another one of those one-size-fits-all conveyor belt laws that will keep the prisons stocked with fresh humans. She even took $3500 from the Prison Guard Assault Task Force, even after the President of it, Charles Hughes was fired from the prison in her own district for his role in the senseless murder of Eddie Arraiga. If law enforcement labor unions are heavily backing initiatives with Little Girl's names on them, it is common sense that such laws are a coming war on the people.

Did you ever study the money trail on the Three Strikes Law? Prop 14? Repugs will invest heavily if they can use fear-mongering to expand their party and get more "punishers" elected to office.

Never forget that the Governor is a Repug who stated in his last campaign "respect for the Nazis", and who has refused to allow the media access to the prisons.

The Governor is a person with a past far more sordid than many of the prisoners he recently condemned to longer terms in prison with hypocritical legislation. There are porno photos of him all over the internet, movies of him drugged out, a sexual harassment lawsuit was recently settled and yet he is leading the parade against sex offenders? Such hypocrisy!

Follow the money trail always. At the end of it you will find stinking, rotten intentions executed by some very shady characters who care more about power than people.

Posted by: Michael Westmoreland at September 30, 2006 01:48 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

Get email updates!

Get Email Updates

Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.



© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.

RSS

Stat tracker