Advertise Here

Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.

Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.

Learn more about ads.

About Us

David Greenwald, Editor. (Contact David.)
CFC Education Foundation, Publisher. (Contact us.)

Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column?
Contact David here.

About California Progress Report.

Founded by Frank D. Russo (Publisher and Editor, 2006-08).

Sponsors

Books

Bowen Bill Requiring Disclosure of Backers When Signatures Are Sought for Ballot Initiatives is Close to Going to Governor

A Hot Potato: Republicans Have Lined Up With Big Money and Against Reform

frankrusso-small.jpg

By Frank D. Russo

In a few days the Governor is likely see on his desk a bill by Senator Debra Bowen, the Chair of the Senate Elections Committee, that would require those gathering signatures to qualify a proposition for the ballot who is bankrolling the effort and whether the person asking them to sign is a volunteer or a paid signature gatherer. SB 1598 passed the California Assembly this week on a strict party line vote of 43 to 28 with all Democrats in favor and all Republicans opposed. It has previously passed the Senate on a similar partisan vote and that body will vote on concurring in minor amendments made in the Assembly before it goes to the Governor.

This will set up a very interesting test of the Governor. He vetoed a similar bill last year. But that was before the “Special Election” last year where measures placed on the ballot by paid signature gatherers, were all defeated by the people after $300 million dollars (a national record amount) was spent on ads and $60 million of public money was wasted on the election. Arnold says he learned his lesson from his defeats last year. This is an election year—we will see if he signs the Bowen bill or sides with money and against disclosure for voters to make an intelligent decision on what gets on the ballot.

The San Francisco Chronicle on Wednesday editorialized in favor of SB 1598 and criticized the Governor in a piece “Following the money.” It’s short and readable, and I recommend taking a look at it. They make the point quite clear.

The initiative—the right of the people to vote directly on ballot propositions--was a great progressive reform brought to us by Hiram Johnson almost a century ago. It required a certain amount of signatures to be gathered on petitions so that it would be reserved to situations where there was a popular uprising for a measure to be on the ballot.

This is not the process we have now. Instead of average citizens bringing their ironing boards out to public places because they want to see a measure on the ballot, voters who are going about their daily business are confronted by paid bounty hunters soliciting their signatures. In almost all cases they have no idea of what they are signing—and no information of who is behind the proposal, who is financing it, and whether the person asking them to sign is a volunteer or paid.

All that exists now is a statement in relatively small 12 point type that the petition may be circulated by a paid signature gatherer and that you have a right to know. How you get to find that out is another question as those being paid per signature gathered may say something orally, and if you ask them who is behind the measure, they may not even know. All they often know is who is paying them their bounty.

What Bowen’s bill requires is that at the top of the petition it be stated in 24 point type is the petition is being circulated by a volunteer or by a paid signature gatherer. Also, the names of the five largest contributors (and if they share a common employer) need to be disclosed. Wouldn’t you want to know that information? Why have Republicans in the legislature opposed our right to know this?

In his veto measure of a similar bills, SB 469, that Bowen also authored and sent to his desk, this is the veto statement of the Governor that can only be called Orwellian:

This bill attacks the initiative process and makes it more difficult for the people of California to gather signatures and qualify measures for the ballot. While difficulty of the process may be a good thing for big-money special interests and for political consultants who stand to gain financially, it is not for everyday Californians with an idea for reform.

This turns reality on its head. In fact these bills make it more difficult for the special interests to buy their way onto the ballot and easier for volunteer efforts to distinguish themselves from the chaff of all these other “astroturf” efforts.

The Governor goes on to say in this veto message that: “The paid or volunteer status of a circulator has no bearing on the merits of the petition being presented to voters.” Maybe he doesn’t go to grocery markets any more—but I don’t see many shoppers actually reading the text of the proposed ballot propositions to determine the merits before they sign a petition, especially while holding a bag or two of groceries or trying to get home before the ice cream melts. Besides, isn’t that for us to decide when we make a decision to sign or not sign a petition?

This is a fundamental reform of the initiative process needed to keep it alive. Money has corrupted this sacred process, and if the Governor doesn’t understand that, especially after last year’s election, we need a replacement and to take back our government. Hiram is rolling around in his grave in Colma right now.

Posted on August 25, 2006

Comments

Sorry, comments are temporarily disabled. We're doing a bit of server maintenance on the commenting area. We'll be back up and running shortly. Thank you for your patience.

Get email updates!

Get Email Updates

Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.



© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.

RSS

Stat tracker