Advertise Here
Deliver your message to thousands of readers every day.
Our readers are influential opinion makers - politicians, journalists and activists.
Our latest headlines
- Obama’s Pick of Panetta for CIA Director Draws Array of Responses
- Is Budget Plan by Democrats in Legal Jeopardy?
- Great Priests Have Helped Me Immeasurably Throughout My Life
- The Holidays Are Over, Now When Are We Going to Get Serious?
- Cavala: Should the Legislature Be Tanked Because 15% Of Their Staff Obtain Raises And Others Get “Plumb Jobs” as Lobbyists?
- California in Desperate Need of a Stimulus Package
- California is in Desperate Need of a Gas Tax
About Us
The California Progress Report is published by Frank D. Russo, a longtime observer of and participant in California politics.
About Frank Russo.
About California Progress Report.
Got a news tip? Want to write a guest column? Contact Frank here.
Sponsors
Books
Universal Pre-School from the Perspective of a Parent

By Terry Preston
A good friend of mine, active in grassroots Democratic politics, recently told me of a discussion she had recently had with some other progressive activists about questions they had as to Proposition 82. She heard a fear that it would direct funds from other educational needs, encourage privatization of public schools and lead to more ‘ballot box budgeting’.
I answered her as a parent of a second grader who enjoyed full-time care at professional child care services because mom and dad both need to work. I support Proposition 82.
Prop 82 doesn’t divert or “lock” up money which the legislature could use elsewhere. Under the constitution, it takes 2/3 of the legislature to raise taxes and we’ll see the minority Republicans agree to raise taxes when we see popsicles in Hell. Currently, the only way to raise additional revenue is through initiatives, which only require a simply majority to pass. As a result, this revenue stream is simply beyond the Legislature’s ability to reach for any other purpose. It’s a poor system but California voters recently turned down a ballot measure to give a simple majority of the Legislature the power to pass a budget and raise taxes so this doesn’t appear likely to change anytime soon.
The measure provides that county offices of education administer the program by determining who will provide the service. Nothing mandates that it has to be run through existing public schools. The practical reality is that it will most likely be run through existing child care providers for the simple reason that few parents who currently have their kids in full time childcare are going to pull them out in favor of a mere three hour program. Nor is this diverting money to “privatization.” Many if not most child care providers already receive state child care funds. My son has been enrolled in two childcare providers serving economically diverse populations and I’ve been –required- to apply for subsidized care whether I need it for not as a condition of the service receiving state aid. What Prop 82 would do is expand this system even further by requiring and offering a higher and more level of training for preschool providers than we currently enjoy. A 1 to 8 teacher to child ratio isn’t perfect but it’s a heckuva lot better than the up to 1 to 20 ratios they’ll see in kindergarten (and which teachers fought for years to get). It should be good enough to do the job.
Yes, middle class kids will benefit too, but then we don’t set a sliding scale for public schools, do we? It also brings middle class voters in to support it at the polls, which is critical for any ballot box tax increase.
The educational reality is, as I learned when my son brought home homework during his second week in kindergarten, is that we’ve essentially added another grade to public school. Kindergarten used to be where kids learned ABC and 123 and how to line up properly. Now, these skills are presumed from the first day. One of my son’s kindergarten classmates actually “flunked” kindergarten because he didn’t have these skills. It seems to make good sense to formally acknowledge this evolution and start public education at the earlier age we’ve effectively mandated for it already. Public education has always been free and universally available. Why should universal preschool education be different?
Here’s a quick, highly readable summary of the proposal recently produced by the Legislative Analyst’s Office.
Terry Preston is a proud native Californian who has been active in state and local politics for over twenty years. He began as a research analyst at the California Judicial Council prior to serving as a legislative assistant to Assemblymember Elihu Harris. He is currently a market and policy advisor and lives with his wife, a teacher, and his son in the Natomas area of Sacramento.
Comments
Post a comment
Get Email Updates
Want the California Progress Report by email? Once a week, we'll send you the latest and greatest headlines.
© 2008 California Progress Report Our copyright and fair use policy.
Powered by Mandate Media. Logo design by Jane Norling.
RSS 